Health & Wellness 2
New Medical Technologies, Procedures and Cures will be listed as well.
Please be advised that although these Articles and Videos that are shared with you, the public,
can be beneficial, they do not take the place of advice from Medical and Wellness Professionals.
Please, use your discretion when applying these articles or videos of advice.

WARNING: The ‘healthy’ sweetener in your kitchen was originally developed as an insecticide.
Discover the shocking truth about sucralose, the artificial sweetener hiding in thousands of “healthy” products that’s causing more harm than sugar. Originally developed as an insecticide in 1975, this chemical compound is now the fastest-growing sweetener worldwide, found in everything from protein bars to diet drinks.
New research reveals disturbing findings: sucralose may damage DNA, trigger inflammation, and block your body’s natural detoxification processes.
Even more concerning, 70% of people who consume it develop sensitivity symptoms - yet most don’t know they’re affected. In this eye-opening investigation, learn:
- Why this sweetener is 600 times sweeter than sugar (and how it tricks your body)
- The hidden connection between sucralose and insecticide development
- How it prevents your liver from removing other toxins
- Common “health” foods secretly containing this ingredient
- Natural alternatives that are truly safe
- Steps to detox if you’ve been consuming it
Sucralose, a popular artificial sweetener found in countless “health-conscious” foods, has come under scrutiny—but is it really the #1 health hazard? Let’s explore the latest findings clearly and thoughtfully.
Sucralose was discovered in 1976 by accident when scientists researching sugar derivatives ended up with a compound much sweeter than sugar—initially mistaken for an insecticide shutterstock.com+15usrtk.org+15alamy.com+15frontiersin.org+2health.com+2medicalnewstoday.com+2. Today, it’s marketed under names like Splenda and added to everything from protein bars to diet sodas.
Recent studies—mainly in lab settings and animal models—have flagged several concerning effects:
-
DNA damage: A metabolite called sucralose‑6‑acetate (S6A) showed genotoxic effects in test tubes, though the levels needed far exceed typical human consumption ft.com+3medicalnewstoday.com+3verywellhealth.com+3.
-
Inflammation: Mice fed sucralose exhibited liver inflammation and shifts in gut bacteria, raising immune concerns sciencedirect.com+15frontiersin.org+15ft.com+15.
-
Detox interference: Animal studies suggest sucralose could alter enzymes involved in detoxifying drugs and chemicals .
However, major reviews—including recent meta-analyses—conclude that sucralose remains safe when consumed within FDA-approved limits. One assessment noted, “no evidence of toxicity or carcinogenicity” at typical intake levels.
en.wikipedia.org+15sciencedirect.com+15skeptics.stackexchange.com+15
From a conservative viewpoint, sucralose is viewed as a useful tool—providing sweetness without calories and perceived as harmless in moderation. Supporters acknowledge the debates but see the science as reassuringly regulated and evidence-based.
Center-of-the-road thinkers accept that while sucralose may carry some risks, most red flags come from high-dose or lab-only studies. They suggest moderation—particularly for vulnerable groups like children or people with metabolic disorders—and call for human clinical trials to clarify long-term effects. Organizations like WHO still advise caution, highlighting potential links to metabolic diseases and gut health issues .
In summary: sucralose isn’t necessarily “the most dangerous health food ingredient,” but recent research highlights possible signals that merit attention. Balancing benefits like reduced sugar intake with moderation appears to be the prudent approach.
Let me know if you’d like to dive deeper into gut microbiome impacts, the DNA/genotoxicity data, or regulatory responses to these findings.
Sources & Links
-
PubMed Central: Sucralose alters detox enzymes and gut microbiota in rats pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
-
PubMed Central: Immune and inflammation effects in mice
-
US Right to Know: Origin story and marketing newyorker.com
-
Frontiers in Nutrition: Gut microbial changes and liver inflammation en.wikipedia.org+12frontiersin.org+12frontiersin.org+12
-
Medical News Today: DNA damage potential via S6A metabolite de.wikipedia.org+10medicalnewstoday.com+10verywellhealth.com+10
-
Verywell Health: Genotoxicity in vitro and real-world relevance sciencedirect.com+3verywellhealth.com+3medicalnewstoday.com+3
-
FT: Immune suppression findings in mice health.com+2ft.com+2en.wikipedia.org+2
-
Health.com: Balanced overview including WHO guidance
-
Wikipedia: Comprehensive sucralose safety review sciencedirect.com+15en.wikipedia.org+15frontiersin.org+15
THE BRUTAL TRUTH JUNE 2025
The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.
Female Anatomy - The Female prostate
Rediscovering the Female Prostate — What Science Now Reveals About Skene’s Glands
Female Anatomy - what is that fluid during o.r.g.a.s.m? What is inside it? Female prostate
For decades, medical science largely ignored an essential yet lesser-known part of the female anatomy: the Skene's glands, often referred to as the female prostate. Though not as visibly prominent as the male prostate, these glands have drawn renewed attention in the medical and scientific communities for their role in female sexual health, urinary function, and even hormonal balance.
Located on the front vaginal wall near the urethra, the Skene’s glands are small structures that secrete fluid. During arousal or orgasm, they can release a substance similar in composition to male prostatic fluid. This has led many researchers to assert that women, too, possess a form of prostate—functionally and anatomically analogous, albeit smaller and less centralized.
Histological studies (those that examine tissue structure) have shown that Skene's glands contain PSA (Prostate-Specific Antigen) and PAP (Prostatic Acid Phosphatase), the same enzymes found in the male prostate. This biochemical similarity has reinforced the argument that the female prostate is not simply a myth or an anatomical footnote but a genuine part of female reproductive and excretory systems.
More controversially, the Skene’s glands are often associated with female ejaculation, a topic surrounded by cultural taboos and scientific disagreement. Some studies suggest the fluid expelled during female ejaculation originates from these glands and is chemically distinct from urine. Others remain skeptical, citing limited clinical data. Nonetheless, new imaging technologies and biopsies have helped validate the role of Skene’s glands in producing a unique fluid, separate from urinary output.
Some conservative scholars argue the female prostate’s marginalization in mainstream education stems from societal discomfort with female sexuality. They contend that decades of neglect in anatomical education have contributed to misinformation, sexual frustration, and even improper medical care—particularly in urology and gynecology. Meanwhile, a middle-of-the-road view acknowledges this organ's biological presence but calls for more research before redefining medical standards or diagnostic procedures.
Recent work in female urogenital mapping and MRI-based studies have started to integrate the female prostate into broader health discussions, particularly for its relevance in prostate-like cancers in women, incontinence treatment, and understanding female sexual dysfunction.
This resurgence of interest in the female prostate is not only reshaping gynecological science but is also helping to bridge gender biases in medical research. Recognizing the Skene’s glands as more than just a mystery tissue reaffirms that female anatomy is rich with complexity and still underexplored in vital ways.
Sources:
-
Jannini, E. A., et al. “The Role of the Skene’s Glands in Female Ejaculation.” The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 2014.
-
Cabello, E. et al. “Immunohistochemical Detection of PSA and PAP in Female Paraurethral Glands.” International Urogynecology Journal, 2010.
-
Kinsey Institute, Sexual Anatomy Research Reports, Indiana University.
THE BRUTAL TRUTH JUNE 2025
The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.