Minister Louis Farrakhan doubled down on past polarizing statements in an impassioned and wide-ranging speech Thursday evening, just one week after Facebook permanently banned him from its social media platforms for violating the tech giant’s policies on hate speech.

Farrakhan, the leader of the Chicago-based Nation of Islam, spoke at the Rev. Michael Pfleger’s St. Sabina Church amid heavy criticism of both men — Farrakhan for his past anti-Semitic and homophobic comments, and Pfleger for welcoming the divisive figurehead into his church.

 

"I'm here to separate the 'good Jews' from the 'Satanic Jews'" - Louis Farrakhan - YouTube

 

THE BRUTAL TRUTH JUNE 2025
The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.

Rabbi Shapiro Questions Zionism’s Role in Jewish Identity

 

 This has sparked debate by challenging widely held assumptions about Zionism and modern Jewish identity. This perspective draws a clear distinction between Judaism—as a religion defined by adherence to Jewish law—and Zionism, viewed as a secular nationalist movement.

Rabbi Shapiro asserts that Jewish identity, according to traditional religious sources, is rooted in the spiritual acceptance of the Torah at Sinai—not tied to ethnicity, nationhood, or land. Modern Zionism, he argues, redefined Jews as a people based on nationality and territory, essentially transplanting religious identity into a political ideology. He describes this shift as “identity theft,” suggesting that Zionism co-opted Jewish identity for secular state-building purposes, undermining Judaism’s spiritual essence youtube.com+15committinghighreason.com+15portalcioranbr.wordpress.com+15.

He further mentions that many aspects popularly attributed to Zionist pioneers—such as Hebrew language revival, the slogan “a land without a people for a people without a land,” and the idea of establishing a Jewish state—were heavily influenced or even initiated by Christian Zionists in the 1800s committinghighreason.com. By framing Hebrew as an ideological tool, Rabbi Shapiro contends that it became a constructed symbol of national identity, distinct from its original sacred and liturgical roots youtube.com+12committinghighreason.com+12portalcioranbr.wordpress.com+12.

Rabbi Shapiro also engages with the complexities of Zionist ideology within historical Orthodox Jewish thought. He highlights that groups like Satmar and Neturei Karta rejected Zionism for religious reasons, believing Jewish autonomy in the Promised Land should await divine redemption—not be forced through human sovereignty. Rabbi Shapiro’s critique is rooted in theology rather than political partisanship en.wikipedia.org+2en.wikipedia.org+2podcasts.apple.com+2.

From a conservative perspective, his argument serves as a reminder that Judaism is fundamentally spiritual, not national, and that across centuries—including the Holocaust—Jewish identity thrived without the existence of a sovereign Jewish state.

Centrist views may recognize religious plurality within Jewish thought—accepting that Zionism played a political role, but questioning whether reframing Jewish identity as a nationalistic project undermines religious tradition. Critics point to the concerns Rabbi Shapiro raises about how nationalism and politics can overshadow spiritual values.

Rabbi Shapiro’s critique invites reflection on key questions: What defines Jewish identity today? Is it rooted in faith and traditions, or has it been redefined through political ideology tied to statehood? How do these distinctions shape Jewish lives and perspectives worldwide?

Also see  https://originalbrutaltruth.blogspot.com/2025/04/forgotten-history.html 

Why All Israeli Prime Ministers Have Fake Names! w/ George Galloway - YouTube

How Israeli Prime Ministers Changed Their Names to Sound More Middle Eastern

---

Visual Media

Video: Rabbi Yaakov Shapiro’s talk—“Zionism Has Nothing to Do with Judaism” reddit.com+15committinghighreason.com+15youtube.com+15rimanajjar.medium.com
Video: “How Zionism Stole Jewish Identity” featuring Rabbi Shapiro portalcioranbr.wordpress.com+3reddit.com+3portalcioranbr.wordpress.com+3

---

Sources and Links

 

• Rabbi Shapiro’s explanation of Zionism as identity theft youtube.com+6committinghighreason.com+65pillarsuk.com+6

• Historical roots of modern Zionist ideology committinghighreason.com+1podcasts.apple.com+1

• Religious Zionism versus anti-Zionist Orthodox views committinghighreason.com+15en.wikipedia.org+15portalcioranbr.wordpress.com+15

• Video: “Zionism Has Nothing to Do with Judaism,” Rabbi Yaakov Shapiro en.wikipedia.org+13committinghighreason.com+13portalcioranbr.wordpress.com+13

• Video: “How Zionism Stole Jewish Identity” featuring Rabbi Shapiro youtube.com+5portalcioranbr.wordpress.com+5portalcioranbr.wordpress.com+5

 

THE BRUTAL TRUTH JUNE 2025

The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.

The interception of Greta Thunberg’s boat by the IDF not just as a geopolitical flashpoint, but as a clear indicator of selective media silence and editorial manipulation in service of entrenched power structures. In this view, the mainstream media's minimal or skewed coverage of such a high-profile activist being stopped while attempting a humanitarian mission—particularly one aimed at Gaza—demonstrates a double standard in how global news events are prioritized and framed.

Fringe theorists interpret the Israeli Defense Forces' (IDF) interception of the Freedom Flotilla, carrying climate activist Greta Thunberg, as a significant event that exposes deeper geopolitical dynamics and challenges mainstream narratives.

 nypost.com

1. Symbolic Resistance Against Global Power Structures

Thunberg's participation in the flotilla is viewed as a deliberate act of defiance against established global powers. Fringe perspectives suggest that her involvement brings heightened visibility to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, forcing international institutions to confront uncomfortable truths. theguardian.com+2thetimes.co.uk+2apnews.com+2

2. Exposure of Media Bias and Information Control

The interception of Greta Thunberg’s boat by the IDF not just as a geopolitical flashpoint, but as a clear indicator of selective media silence and editorial manipulation in service of entrenched power structures. In this view, the mainstream media's minimal or skewed coverage of such a high-profile activist being stopped while attempting a humanitarian mission—particularly one aimed at Gaza—demonstrates a double standard in how global news events are prioritized and framed.

From a fringe standpoint, if Greta had been intercepted by a nation like Russia, China, or Iran, coverage would have been wall-to-wall, saturated with outrage, human rights rhetoric, and symbolic condemnation. But because the actor is Israel—a U.S.-backed ally in the Middle East—media coverage is seen as restrained, euphemized, or completely buried. This, according to these analysts, points to a cozy alliance between corporate media and Western foreign policy objectives, where dissenting narratives are marginalized or sanitized.

Additionally, fringe thinkers argue that narrative control is achieved not just through what is reported—but what is omitted. The near absence of footage, lack of live coverage, or hesitance to interview flotilla members is interpreted as intentional, shielding the public from sympathetic views toward the Palestinian cause or critiques of Israeli policy. When Greta Thunberg, who enjoys global media visibility, is suddenly minimized in the press because her activism intersects with Gaza, fringe theorists claim this exposes how Western media selectively champions “activism” only when it aligns with approved ideological lanes.

This event, they suggest, also reveals a broader pattern of discrediting or ignoring Western figures who begin to voice support for Palestine—treating them as problematic, naïve, or even dangerous to social cohesion. In this model, media outlets serve more as narrative gatekeepers than information platforms, maintaining public consensus in favor of U.S./NATO-aligned foreign policy by ignoring or distorting dissident efforts.3. Catalyst for International Legal and Ethical Debates

The interception raises questions about the legality of blockades and the rights of activists. Fringe theorists posit that this event could ignite broader discussions on international law, human rights, and the ethical responsibilities of nations toward oppressed populations.

 

---

Assessment and Implications

From a fringe viewpoint, the IDF's action against the flotilla is not merely a security measure but a manifestation of larger systemic issues. It underscores the tensions between state sovereignty, humanitarian advocacy, and the struggle for narrative control on the global stage.

 

---

For a visual account of the incident, you might find the following video informative:

🚨 BREAKING: Chaos At UN As IDF Stop Greta Thunberg's Boat

 

 

Drop me an email If you have further questions or need more information on this topic. TBT

THE BRUTAL TRUTH JUNE 2025

The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.

In recent years, a growing number of behaviors once considered typical or benign—introversion, emotional sensitivity, skepticism, solitude, intense focus—have been quietly reclassified in psychological literature as potential indicators of mental illness. While mainstream psychiatry claims these developments reflect better diagnostic precision and early intervention, fringe theorists and independent thinkers are sounding the alarm, arguing that we are witnessing the weaponization of psychology.

1. Medicalizing Normalcy to Expand Control

One of the most prominent concerns is that the expanding definitions of mental illness serve not just to help people, but to categorize, control, and even sedate dissent. Fringe thinkers point out that new editions of the DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) have exponentially increased the number of diagnosable conditions over the past 40 years—from under 100 to nearly 300. Critics argue this bloated expansion turns everyday human traits into disorders.

 

For example:

• Distrust of authority may now fall under paranoid personality disorder.

• Intense sadness after loss is sometimes labeled complicated grief or a depressive episode.

• Persistent solitude or introversion could be misread as social anxiety or avoidant personality disorder.

• Nonconformity in behavior might be interpreted as signs of oppositional defiant disorder (ODD).

Fringe analysts ask: At what point does medicine stop treating and start judging?

 

---

2. Profiting from Pathology: The Pharmaceutical Pipeline

Pharmaceutical industry critics suggest the line between health and illness is being deliberately blurred to create lifelong customers. By expanding what constitutes a “treatable” mental state, more individuals are prescribed medications—SSRIs, antipsychotics, mood stabilizers—even for minor emotional states. Some studies reveal that up to 1 in 6 Americans are now on some form of psychiatric medication.

Fringe perspectives see this not as healing, but as a subtle form of social sedation—keeping the masses chemically pacified while deeper systemic issues go unresolved.

 

---

3. Redefining Sanity in a Surveillance State

A particularly chilling interpretation from fringe theory circles suggests that defining too much emotional awareness, intuition, or skepticism as “abnormal” could be laying the groundwork for pre-crime mental policing.

In this model:

• Those who question mainstream narratives may be labeled "delusional".

• Deeply empathetic individuals might be diagnosed as “emotionally dysregulated”.

• High sensitivity to injustice could become "maladaptive rumination".

This has echoes of Soviet psychiatry, where dissenters were often institutionalized for “sluggish schizophrenia” because they opposed the regime.

 

---

4. The Rise of Technocratic Psychopathy?

Some fringe theorists argue that the more society is led by emotionally detached, algorithmic decision-making, the more truly human behavior—like spontaneous creativity, grief, moral outrage, or deep solitude—becomes inconvenient.

They claim that labeling natural emotional expression as disorder subtly promotes technocratic values: conformity, efficiency, detachment, and rationalism. If you’re too emotional, too skeptical, or too passionate, you’re not well—you’re dysregulated.

 

---

Conclusion: Pathologizing the Human Spirit

While mental health awareness is vital and life-saving for many, fringe perspectives urge caution. They believe society is nearing a point where to feel deeply, to question, or to grieve for too long might be seen as an illness. Instead of nurturing the soul, we may be training it into silence.

 

In the words of R.D. Laing, a once-maligned psychiatrist turned rebel:
“Insanity — a perfectly rational adjustment to an insane world.”

 

THE BRUTAL TRUTH JUNE 2025

The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.

Fringe Theory and Others: Brutal Assessments on Democrats Losing Voters to Trump

From fringe theorists, populist commentators, and anti-establishment voices on both the left and right, the fact that Donald Trump is gaining traction among Democrat voters is not just a polling anomaly—it is viewed as a symptom of systemic political collapse within the Democratic Party and a backlash against globalist, technocratic elitism that’s left the working class behind.

 

The Red Pill Effect: Populist Awakening Among Disillusioned Democrats

One of the most brutal fringe narratives says that blue-collar Democrats, urban minorities, and suburban independents are experiencing a “Red Pill” moment—waking up to what they perceive as years of betrayal by party elites. They see Trump’s rise among Dems not as about him becoming more likable, but as evidence that Trump is now the symbol of rebellion against the regime—a regime not limited to one party, but including corporations, media, academia, and even intelligence agencies.

The theory suggests that many traditional Democrats are tired of what they view as the party's obsession with identity politics, open borders, forced medical compliance, censorship, and globalist economic policies that enrich billionaires but hollow out communities. As inflation soars, cities crumble, crime spikes, and war drums beat, some now see Trump not as a perfect man—but as the only one willing to fight the machine.

 

Psychological Whiplash and Controlled Opposition Collapse

Some brutal assessments go further, arguing that the Democratic Party has become a controlled opposition that outlived its usefulness. According to this theory, the party’s base was once anti-establishment—but now parrots corporate, military-industrial, and surveillance-state narratives. Fringe leftists feel betrayed: Biden, they argue, has governed like a Bush-era neocon—pro-war, pro-Wall Street, and pro-censorship.

This betrayal creates psychological whiplash in left-leaning voters who once valued free speech, workers’ rights, and bodily autonomy. They watched as the Democratic Party became the face of:

• Forced lockdowns and jab mandates

• FBI and DOJ censorship of dissent

• Endless Ukraine aid and war escalation

• Support for Israel’s bombardment of Gaza, even while preaching “equity” at home

• Gaslighting over inflation, crime, and border security

For these voters, even if they don’t like Trump, the alternative looks like decay wrapped in a rainbow flag.

 

Election Narrative Breakdown and Panic Inside the Establishment

Fringe theorists also interpret this polling shift as a sign of panic within the ruling class. Trump's slight rise among Democrats is, in their view, not just about 4 points—it's about the beginning of a defection that cannot be stopped by media narratives or lawfare tactics.

According to this view, the endless indictments, media censorship, and social media de-platforming of Trump were designed to scare the middle—but instead, they’ve made him appear as the ultimate underdog, especially to voters who feel silenced, marginalized, or lied to by the system.

Brutal analysts say if Trump can pull 6-10% of the Democratic base in swing states while retaining his Republican core, it mathematically destroys Biden’s chances—and the establishment knows it. Hence, they believe this polling movement may provoke:

• A Biden replacement at the DNC

• “October surprises” involving Trump’s eligibility or arrests

• Renewed pandemic or wartime emergencies to shift the narrative

In other words, the deeper the threat to the establishment, the more desperate the countermeasures will become.

 

Black and Latino Shift: The Crumbling Coalition

One of the most explosive fringe assessments is that Democrats are losing their hold on Black and Latino voters, especially men. Once seen as a guaranteed firewall, these demographics are increasingly drawn to Trump’s bluntness, economic messaging, and law-and-order stance—especially as cities decline and jobs vanish.

Critics argue that the Democratic Party’s response to this shift has been condescending and performative—offering symbolic gestures like DEI programs or flag-waving rather than real community investment or security. Fringe analysts view the rise in Trump support as an indictment of Democratic elitism, suburban hypocrisy, and the abandonment of the working class.

They also point out that illegal immigration has become a wedge issue, especially among working-class citizens who feel their neighborhoods and wages are being sacrificed in the name of globalist policies. The narrative now goes: Trump is trying to protect you. The Democrats are protecting the invaders.

 

The Controlled Burn Theory: Letting Biden Crash So Newsom or Obama Can Rise

Some of the more Machiavellian theories posit that Democrats are intentionally letting Biden fall apart—using his failing mental state and plummeting popularity as cover to swap in a "savior" candidate like Gavin Newsom or even Michelle Obama.

In this view, Trump’s rising popularity among Dems might not just be an accident—it’s being allowed to happen to create chaos and justify a reset at the Democratic National Convention. Michelle Obama, for instance, has universal name recognition and is immune to most of the scandals that plague Biden and Harris.

The brutal fringe take? The DNC is playing a long con. Biden is disposable. The real battle begins when the mask comes off at the convention.

Conclusion

To fringe theorists and brutal political analysts, Trump gaining ground among Democrats isn’t a fluke—it’s a sign that the spell is breaking. Years of media gaslighting, cultural authoritarianism, and economic betrayal are driving ordinary Democrats to question everything. Some are shifting to Trump not because he’s perfect—but because he’s not part of the cult that ruined their cities, censored their speech, and sold out their futures.

They warn: if these numbers keep climbing, expect a desperate establishment to escalate the narrative war, or even fabricate crises to stop Trump’s return.

 

The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.