Rep. Andy Ogles Introduces Constitutional Amendment to Give President Trump a Third Term!
“President Trump’s decisive leadership stands in stark contrast to the chaos, suffering, and economic decline Americans have endured over the past four years. He has proven himself to be the only figure in modern history capable of reversing our nation’s decay and restoring America to greatness, and he must be given the time necessary to accomplish that goal.”
- Rep. Andy Ogles
Read Andy Biggs' Full Resolution to Give President Trump a Third Term Here!
Learn More About Why We Need a Third Term Project and Become an Advocate for This Project Here
The Dirt Files
A newly added page to the website. All you ever wanted to know about the Clintons but were afraid to ask.
MAY 2025
🌺💐🌸💮🪷🌹🪻🌷🌻🌼
Mutiny in China – Young Chinese TURN AGAINST Xi Jinping
Mutiny in China – Young Chinese TURN AGAINST Xi Jinping
In recent months, China has witnessed a surge in youth-led protests, signaling growing discontent with President Xi Jinping's leadership. These demonstrations, reminiscent of the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests, have been fueled by a combination of economic challenges, political repression, and a desire for greater personal freedoms.
The tragic death of 17-year-old Dang Changxin in Pucheng, Shaanxi Province, served as a catalyst for widespread unrest. Dang's death, under suspicious circumstances, and the subsequent swift closure of the investigation by authorities, sparked outrage among students and citizens alike. Protests erupted, with demonstrators demanding transparency and accountability. Clashes with riot police ensued, leading to numerous injuries and arrests. news
Beyond this incident, a broader movement has taken shape. In Chengdu, a lone protester displayed banners calling for political reform and criticizing unchecked power, reflecting a growing desire for democratic governance. These acts of defiance, though met with swift crackdowns, highlight a shift in the public's willingness to challenge the status Quo. China Digital Times (CDT)
Economic factors also play a significant role. High youth unemployment rates and limited opportunities have led many young Chinese to adopt a "let it rot" attitude, expressing apathy towards traditional societal expectations.
This sentiment, coupled with frustration over strict government policies, has intensified calls for change. Business & Finance News
While the Chinese government continues to suppress dissent through censorship and surveillance, the persistence of these protests indicates a deep-rooted desire for reform among the younger generation. As the situation evolves, the international community watches closely, considering the potential implications for China's future trajectory.
While China's government frequently promotes its global economic dominance and technological progress, a closer look reveals growing internal strains that contradict that outward image. Several key indicators suggest that the country is facing mounting challenges:
1. Economic Slowdown
China’s once double-digit GDP growth has slowed significantly. Official data reported 5.2% growth in 2023, but many analysts believe the real figure could be lower due to manipulated statistics. The property sector, once a major growth engine, has collapsed under the weight of debt and oversupply—Evergrande and Country Garden being the most notable examples. Youth unemployment soared so high that Beijing stopped reporting it altogether in 2023, signaling concern over domestic perception.
2. Demographic Crisis
China's population is shrinking. In 2022, it reported its first population decline in 60 years. Projections suggest that its labor force will continue to contract, straining pensions and social programs. The country now faces the prospect of growing old before it grows rich, a major hurdle for its long-term development.
3. Authoritarian Controls and Censorship
Beijing's increasingly repressive policies under Xi Jinping have driven capital and talent out of the country. The clampdown on the tech sector, education companies, and outspoken entrepreneurs has stifled innovation. Foreign firms are growing wary of investing due to arbitrary enforcement of laws, surveillance, and political risks.
4. Global Pushback and De-coupling
Geopolitical tensions, especially with the U.S., have led to trade restrictions, chip bans, and companies relocating supply chains out of China. Western democracies are increasingly scrutinizing China’s influence operations, forced labor practices, and alignment with authoritarian regimes like Russia and Iran. Many nations are now actively “de-risking” their economic exposure.
5. Public Discontent
From the 2022 “White Paper” protests to the current unrest among youth, dissatisfaction is simmering beneath the surface. Movements like "Tang Ping" (lying flat) and "Bai Lan" (let it rot) reflect a generation disillusioned with their prospects. These sentiments challenge the party's narrative of national rejuvenation.
While China remains a major power, its foundation is less stable than often advertised. The combination of economic fragility, demographic pressure, international resistance, and internal unrest presents serious challenges to the CCP's long-term vision. For now, the government maintains a tight grip, but the cracks are increasingly visible.
Sources:
-
China Digital Times – The Chengdu Overpass Protest and Its Antecedents
-
Business Standard – Bai Lan movement: Why Chinese youth are 'lying flat' and 'letting it rot
The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.
🤡👍Dear Democrats, please keep doing what you're doing👍🤡
When individuals enter the United States illegally and then go on to commit crimes, the legal process surrounding their deportation becomes far more straightforward under U.S. immigration law.
CNN Cuts to Commercial When FIGHTING Starts After Anna Navarro Compares Slaves to Illegal Immigrants
In these cases, conservative and mainstream legal frameworks strongly support the removal of such individuals—not only because they violated immigration laws by entering unlawfully, but because they also violated U.S. criminal laws once inside the country.
Here’s how the law addresses these situations:
-
Criminal Conduct Triggers Removal: Under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), non-citizens (including undocumented immigrants) can be deported if they commit certain crimes. These include aggravated felonies, drug trafficking, violent crimes, firearms offenses, and crimes involving moral turpitude. Convictions for these can result in mandatory detention and expedited removal proceedings.
-
Limited Protections for Criminal Aliens: Unlike asylum seekers or immigrants with lawful status who might be entitled to hearings or appeals, undocumented immigrants convicted of crimes typically have fewer legal avenues to avoid deportation. Courts, including immigration judges, tend to give considerable deference to enforcement actions when public safety is involved.
-
Sanctuary Policies and Local Resistance: In some jurisdictions, sanctuary city policies have created friction between local law enforcement and federal immigration authorities. Conservatives often criticize these policies, arguing that they shield dangerous individuals from removal and violate the principle of equal justice under the law.
-
Public Safety and Victims' Rights: From a conservative perspective, allowing individuals who entered illegally and then committed crimes to remain in the country sends a dangerous message and undermines the safety of law-abiding citizens. Deportation in such cases is not just a matter of immigration enforcement—it’s seen as a necessary measure to uphold law and order and protect communities.
In summary, if someone entered illegally and then committed crimes while in the United States, their deportation is not typically considered "wrongful" under the law. Instead, it is viewed as a lawful and justified action that reflects both immigration enforcement priorities and broader criminal justice standards.
Most conservatives and moderates alike agree that such individuals should be removed promptly and barred from reentry.
The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.
Stephen Miller Unleashes Firestorm In White House Press Room
🚨BREAKING: Seconds Ago: Stephen Miller
Unleashes Firestorm in White House Press Room! - YouTube
On May 1, 2025, White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller delivered a passionate and controversial briefing, emphasizing the administration's commitment to dismantling what he described as "cancerous, communist, woke culture." Miller's remarks underscored the administration's focus on cultural issues, including immigration, gender policies, and diversity programs. From a conservative standpoint, the briefing represented a long-awaited re-centering of national policy around traditional American values, constitutional governance, and the restoration of common sense in government.
Miller’s rhetoric resonated with many conservatives who argue that progressive cultural policies have eroded national unity, undermined the rule of law, and prioritized fringe agendas over the concerns of everyday Americans. His framing of woke ideology as a threat to national identity and stability echoed sentiments voiced by Republican lawmakers and grassroots activists who see government-enforced social engineering—whether in classrooms, military settings, or hiring practices—as both unconstitutional and socially destructive.
In addressing immigration, Miller doubled down on the administration’s belief that sanctuary city policies and lax border enforcement enabled criminal elements like MS-13 to thrive. He noted that Democrats and left-leaning media outlets were more concerned with political correctness than the safety of American families, a message that plays well with law-and-order voters. His assertion that the media’s portrayal of deportations distorted the facts was aimed squarely at undermining narratives that he argued favor criminal non-citizens over law-abiding citizens.
Miller’s criticism of gender policy and DEI programs also struck a chord with conservatives who have long challenged the expansion of federal power into areas of personal belief and institutional autonomy. His promise to eliminate DEI mandates within federal agencies was praised by critics who believe such programs foster racial division and undermine merit-based achievement. The administration's approach is being celebrated in many conservative circles as a decisive pushback against years of bureaucratic overreach and ideological experimentation.
Altogether, the briefing was not just a defense of policy—it was a cultural statement. Miller’s remarks clarified that under this administration, cultural issues are not secondary—they are central to the broader goal of restoring American self-determination, safeguarding tradition, and reasserting national sovereignty.
During the briefing, Miller criticized the media's coverage of immigration enforcement, particularly cases involving individuals with alleged gang affiliations. He defended the administration's actions, asserting that deportations of individuals like Kilmar Abrego Garcia were necessary to protect American communities. Miller challenged reporters, suggesting that their coverage favored criminal elements over public safety concerns.
Addressing gender policies, Miller condemned the previous administration's approach, claiming that housing transgender women in female prisons led to increased risks of sexual assault. He announced that the current administration would enforce policies requiring inmates to be housed according to their biological sex and would prohibit federal funding for gender-transition treatments in prisons.
Miller also targeted diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs, arguing that they compromised merit-based hiring and contributed to societal division. He stated that the administration would take steps to eliminate DEI initiatives within federal agencies and institutions receiving federal funding.
The briefing highlighted the administration's prioritization of cultural issues over economic concerns, as Miller made minimal reference to the nation's economic challenges. This focus reflects the administration's strategy to appeal to its base by addressing contentious social topics.
Sources:
-
Washington Post – Miller highlights key Trump priority: the war against ‘cancerous, woke culture’
-
Fox News – White House deputy chief of staff rails against reporters over MS-13, TdA coverage
Video
🚨BREAKING: Seconds Ago: Stephen Miller Unleashes Firestorm In White House Press Room!
The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.
It's a combination of imposed injections and the deployment of 5g technology.
Numerous people have collapsed in public, and rural cemeteries are nearly full.
Claims suggesting that COVID-19 vaccines and 5G technology have caused deaths in China have been widely circulated online. However, these assertions lack credible scientific evidence and have been consistently debunked by experts and health authorities (Mainstream).
While mainstream science has dismissed any link between 5G technology and COVID-19, fringe theories and alternative researchers continue to explore a different narrative—one that ties technological infrastructure and biological response to broader agendas of control and experimentation.
According to fringe theorists, the rollout of 5G technology coinciding with the emergence of COVID-19 is not a coincidence but a coordinated strategy. These researchers argue that 5G’s millimeter wave frequencies, though officially classified as non-ionizing, may have biological effects that are underreported or deliberately minimized. They point to small studies suggesting that prolonged exposure to EMF (electromagnetic fields) can lead to cellular stress, oxidative damage, or immune system suppression. In this view, 5G does not "cause" COVID-19, but may weaken immune defenses, making individuals more vulnerable to viruses or exacerbating symptoms.
Some proponents go further, claiming that the electromagnetic environment created by 5G may be deliberately weaponized or used in tandem with digital surveillance and biomedical programs to manipulate public behavior or monitor biometric data in real-time. These claims often reference classified military research, such as past DARPA projects involving neuroweapons or crowd control technologies.
In parallel, fringe theorists also question the motivations and transparency behind mass vaccination campaigns. Some allege that mRNA vaccine platforms serve not only to immunize populations but also to introduce nanotechnology capable of interacting with 5G or other digital infrastructure.
These theories cite patent filings, DARPA research into hydrogel biosensors, or documents from the World Economic Forum about future human-machine integration under frameworks like the “Fourth Industrial Revolution.” Though these claims remain speculative and are widely dismissed by institutional science, they continue to fuel online communities that distrust centralized public health narratives.
Other alternative researchers tie these concerns into broader depopulation or transhumanist agendas, arguing that the combination of electromagnetic exposure, vaccine ingredients, and long-term health manipulation could serve to reshape human biology, social control structures, and global population management under the guise of pandemic response.
While these theories are not supported by peer-reviewed studies or mainstream medical bodies, they resonate strongly among segments of the public who distrust global institutions, especially in light of past government experimentation (e.g., Tuskegee Syphilis Study, MK-Ultra) and inconsistent messaging during the COVID-19 pandemic.
In summary, the claims that COVID-19 vaccines and 5G technology have led to deaths in China are (Mainstream) unfounded. Both technologies have been subjected to rigorous testing and monitoring to ensure their safety and efficacy. It is important to rely on credible sources and scientific evidence when evaluating such claims.
The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.