The Dirt Files

A newly added page to the website. All you ever wanted to know about the Clintons but were afraid to ask.

They own you.

 

“The politicians are put there to give you the idea that you have freedom of choice. You don’t. You have no choice. You have owners. They own you. They own everything. They own all the important land. They own and control the corporations. They’ve long since bought and paid for the Senate, the Congress, the state houses, the city halls. They got the judges in their back pockets and they own all the big media companies, so they control just about all of the news and information you get to hear… They spend billions of dollars every year lobbying. Lobbying to get what they want. Well, we know what they want. They want more for themselves and less for everybody else... It’s called the American Dream, 'cause you have to be asleep to believe it.”

 

-- George Carlin

 


Rep. Andy Ogles Introduces Constitutional Amendment to Give President Trump a Third Term!

 

“President Trump’s decisive leadership stands in stark contrast to the chaos, suffering, and economic decline Americans have endured over the past four years. He has proven himself to be the only figure in modern history capable of reversing our nation’s decay and restoring America to greatness, and he must be given the time necessary to accomplish that goal.”

- Rep. Andy Ogles

 

Read Andy Biggs' Full Resolution to Give President Trump a Third Term Here!

 

Learn More About Why We Need a Third Term Project and Become an Advocate for This Project Here


 

 

====

THE BRUTAL TRUTH SHOW #6

RERUN OF THE SHOW... ENJOY

 


MAY 2025

🌺💐🌸💮🪷🌹🪻🌷🌻🌼

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Iran Rejects "Unacceptable" US Demand To Dismantle Nuclear Sites

 


Trumps immigration crackdown could shift 26 House Democratic seats

 

President Donald Trump's intensified immigration enforcement efforts could significantly influence the political landscape, potentially affecting up to 26  Democratic seats in the U.S. House of Representatives.

 

📊 Impact on Congressional Apportionment

 

The U.S. Census determines the allocation of House seats based on total population counts, which include undocumented immigrants. In 2020, the Center for Immigration Studies estimated that immigration contributed to the shift of 17 House seats, redistributing political power among states. Trump's administration attempted to exclude undocumented immigrants from the census count, a move that faced legal challenges and was ultimately blocked by the courts. 

Wikipedia+1The Texas Tribune+1CISWikipedia+2The Texas Tribune+2Wikipedia+2

 

🏛️ Legislative and Policy Measures

Trump's current legislative agenda includes substantial funding for immigration enforcement. A proposed bill allocates $69 billion for border security, aiming to hire 20,000 new immigration officers and construct a 700-mile border wall. Additionally, the administration has introduced "Project Homecoming," a program offering financial incentives for undocumented migrants to voluntarily leave the U.S., with increased enforcement for those who do not comply. 

AP NewsReuters+1The Times of India+1

 

🗳️ Political Ramifications

If undocumented immigrants are excluded from the population counts used for congressional apportionment, states with large immigrant communities—such as California, New York, and Texas—could potentially lose seats in the House of Representatives. 

These states have historically seen population growth driven in part by immigration, both legal and undocumented. Removing undocumented individuals from census-based population totals would reduce these states' overall count, leading to a loss in representation and, therefore, electoral influence. On the other hand, states with smaller immigrant populations, including many in the Midwest and parts of the South, could gain seats as the total number of representatives remains fixed at 435 and would be redistributed based on the adjusted population. 

 

This would effectively shift political power away from traditionally Democrat-leaning urban areas toward more conservative-leaning rural or suburban regions. 

 

The result could be a recalibration of the national legislative map in favor of Republicans, who are generally more supportive of stricter immigration enforcement. This demographic rebalancing, driven by policy rather than migration trends alone, could shape federal policymaking for years to come, affecting everything from federal funding formulas to the Electoral College distribution in future presidential elections.

NPR+2Wikipedia+2Wikipedia+2

While the exact impact remains uncertain, the intersection of immigration policy and congressional apportionment underscores the significant political implications of Trump's enforcement strategies.

Third Way

 

Sources

AP News What's in Trump's big bill? Money for migrant clampdown but tax breaks and program cuts hit 'bumps' 6 days ago  

 

The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.


The Israeli who invented the 7 October

"burned babies" lie, with David Sheen

 

We speak with the Haifa-based investigative journalist David Sheen who has authored several critically important exposés of Israel’s lies and cover-ups of what happened on 7 October 2023.

 

Sheen’s latest piece for The Electronic Intifada is "The Vach brothers: Israel’s first family of genocide."


The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.


Affirm Your Kid's Chosen Gender Or Lose Custody? Colorado's Chilling New Bill

 

Affirm Your Kid's Chosen Gender Or Lose Custody? Colorado's Chilling New Bill | ZeroHedge

 

The Colorado legislature has passed House Bill 25-1312, known as the "Kelly Loving Act," which introduces legal protections for transgender individuals. Initially, the bill included a provision requiring courts to consider a parent's refusal to affirm their child's gender identity—such as misgendering or deadnaming—as "coercive control" in custody decisions. However, this provision was removed following significant public opposition and concerns about parental rights and free speech.

Deseret News+11Colorado Newsline+11Colorado Newsline+11Colorado Public Radio+11America First Policy+11Reason.com+11

The final version of the bill, approved by the Colorado Senate on May 6, 2025, focuses on other areas: Colorado Newsline

  • It designates intentional misgendering and deadnaming as discriminatory acts under the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act, prohibiting such actions in public accommodationsReason.com+8KOAA News 5+8BillTrack50+8

  • It mandates that school policies regarding names and dress codes be inclusive and non-discriminatory, allowing students to use their chosen names and select dress code options without gender restrictionsCBS News+3BillTrack50+3Colorado Newsline+3

  • It facilitates changes to gender markers on official documents, allowing individuals to change their sex designation up to three times without requiring a court orderDeseret News+2BillTrack50+2Colorado Newsline+2

The bill is named in honor of Kelly Loving, a transgender woman who was among the victims of the 2022 Club Q shooting in Colorado Springs.

BillTrack50+7KOAA News 5+7Colorado Newsline+7

While the most controversial custody-related provision was removed, the bill has still faced criticism from some groups who argue that it infringes on parental rights and free speech.

Colorado Public Radio

Governor Jared Polis, who has previously supported legislation expanding transgender rights, is expected to sign the bill into law.

Deseret News

 

The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.


Israel Accused Of ATTACKING Iranian Base - Chaos Erupts

 

On October 26, 2024, Israel launched a significant military operation, codenamed Operation Days of Repentance, targeting Iranian military infrastructure across Iran, Iraq, and Syria. This action was in retaliation for Iran's earlier missile attacks on Israel, notably the unprecedented direct assault on April 13, 2024, when Iran fired over 300 drones and missiles at Israeli territory. Wikipedia+1RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty+1Wikipedia

Key Aspects of the Israeli Operation

  • Scale and Execution: The operation involved over 100 Israeli aircraft, including F-35I stealth fighters, striking 20 locations within Iran. Targets included missile production facilities, air-defense systems, and a suspected nuclear weapons research site at the Parchin military complex. Wikipedia+1RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty+1

  • Strategic Impact: U.S. and Israeli assessments indicate that the strikes severely degraded Iran's missile production capabilities and air-defense network, including the destruction of several S-300 systems. This has potentially reduced Iran's capacity for long-range missile attacks and its ability to defend against aerial incursions. RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty+1Wikipedia+1

  • Casualties and Damage: Iran reported the deaths of four army officers and one security guard. While Iranian state media downplayed the extent of the damage, satellite imagery and independent analyses suggest significant impacts on military infrastructure. Wikipedia

Regional and International Reactions

  • Iran's Response: Iran condemned the attacks, with officials threatening retaliation. However, the extent and timing of any response remain uncertain, especially given the reported damage to Iran's offensive and defensive military capabilities. RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty

  • Global Diplomacy: The United States was briefed prior to the operation but did not participate. Other nations, including Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, have expressed concerns over escalating tensions and have called for restraint to prevent further destabilization in the region. Wikipedia

For a visual overview of these developments, you may find the following video informative:

 

🚨 BREAKING: Israel Accused Of ATTACKING Iranian Base - Chaos Erupts

 

The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.


Serious back and forth going on -- The Truth about Trump's Middle East Peace Negotiations

 

🚨 BREAKING: Trump REJECTS Palestinian State As Islamists Prepare ATTACK

 

The Trump administration's Middle East peace initiatives have sparked significant debate, reflecting a complex interplay of diplomatic efforts, economic interests, and regional dynamics.


🕊️ Key Initiatives and Developments

Abraham Accords: In 2020, under President Trump's leadership, the U.S. brokered normalization agreements between Israel and several Arab nations, including the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain. These accords were hailed by supporters as a historic step toward regional peace, emphasizing economic cooperation and diplomatic engagement.

Peace to Prosperity Plan: Also known as the "Deal of the Century," this 2020 proposal aimed to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict by outlining a framework for a two-state solution. While it offered economic incentives for Palestinians, critics argued that it heavily favored Israeli positions and lacked meaningful input from Palestinian representatives.


🔄 Recent Shifts and Controversies

Gaza Strategy: Reports have emerged about a controversial plan suggesting the relocation of Gaza residents to areas in Jordan and Egypt, coupled with redevelopment initiatives. This proposal faced strong opposition from neighboring countries and raised concerns about its feasibility and potential to exacerbate regional tensions.

The Times+1Wikipedia+1

 

Diplomatic Challenges: Despite initial successes, the Trump administration's efforts to mediate conflicts in Gaza and Ukraine have encountered obstacles. Private remarks from President Trump have indicated frustration over stalled negotiations and the complexities of achieving lasting peace in these regions.

WSJ


🌐 Broader Implications

The administration's focus on economic deals and strategic alliances, particularly with Gulf states, reflects a shift toward leveraging financial incentives in foreign policy. While this approach has yielded some diplomatic breakthroughs, it has also drawn criticism for potentially sidelining human rights considerations and long-standing geopolitical complexities.

NPR

As the Middle East continues to navigate a landscape of evolving alliances and persistent conflicts, the long-term impact of these policies remains a subject of ongoing analysis and debate.


Further Reading:


The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.


Trump Announcing Recognizing Palestine?

 

Breaking: This Announcement will SHAKE the World!!!

 

As of now, there has been no official announcement from former President Donald Trump regarding U.S. recognition of a Palestinian state. 

 

Speculation has arisen due to reports from Gulf diplomatic sources suggesting that Trump might make such a declaration during an upcoming Gulf-U.S. summit in Saudi Arabia. These reports indicate that any potential recognition would exclude Hamas from governance and aim to encourage broader participation in the Abraham Accords.

 

Such speculation raises concern over the potential dilution of Trump’s historically strong pro-Israel stance. 

 

Many conservatives supported Trump precisely because of his unflinching support for Israeli sovereignty, including recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and standing firm against terror-affiliated entities like Hamas. 

 

While Trump’s diplomatic strategies often emphasized deal-making and regional normalization, any move perceived as legitimizing Palestinian statehood—especially under unresolved security and ideological concerns—will likely draw sharp criticism from traditional allies of Israel and the America First base. 

Conservatives stress that any recognition must come with absolute guarantees that Israel's security and historical claims are not compromised to appease international pressure or regional bargaining.

 

JNS.orgThe Media Line+8Report İnformasiya Agentliyi+8Jerusalem Post+8ynetnews+5Jagonews24+5tnnewsonline.com+5

 

However, U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee has dismissed these claims as "nonsense," emphasizing that there are no current plans for such recognition. It's important to note that Trump's previous Middle East policies, including the 2020 peace plan, proposed a conditional and limited form of Palestinian sovereignty, contingent upon various criteria being met by the Palestinians.

ReutersWikipedia+1Wikipedia+1

 

In summary, while discussions and rumors persist, there is no confirmed shift in U.S. policy recognizing a Palestinian state under Trump's leadership at this time.

Jagonews24

 

The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.


Trump’s Shifting Stance Toward Netanyahu: Timeline and Reactions

Observers have pointed out that Trump’s policy toward Israel hasn’t fundamentally flipped – what changed is his tone toward one man, Netanyahu. Even as Trump touts himself as Israel’s greatest friend, his bitterness toward Netanyahu shows through.

Background: An Alliance Turned Sour

Dear Readers,

We kindly wish to inform you that the following article explores the complex and sensitive relationship between the United States and the State of Israel. Our intent is not to promote antisemitism or hate speech in any form. Rather, this piece is presented with care and respect, aiming to shed light on important facts and encourage thoughtful reflection.

Thank you for your understanding and continued readership.

Sincerely,

Editor

The Brutal Truth Website & Blogspot

 

Background: An Alliance Turned Sour

For most of Donald Trump’s presidency (2017–2020), he and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu enjoyed a close and publicly warm partnership. Trump fulfilled key items on Netanyahu’s “wish-list,” including moving the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem, recognizing Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights, withdrawing from the Iran nuclear deal, and brokering normalization deals between Israel and Arab states timesofisrael.com. Netanyahu frequently praised Trump, and Trump was hugely popular in Israel for these policies. However, cracks in this once ironclad rapport emerged toward the end of Trump’s term and after he left office reuters.com.

The first major rift came after the U.S. 2020 election. Netanyahu congratulated Joe Biden on his victory – a gesture of diplomatic courtesy that enraged Trump, who refused to concede. In an interview for an Israeli journalist’s book in late 2021, Trump accused Netanyahu of disloyalty for congratulating Biden, reportedly ranting “Fk him” in reference to Netanyahu axios.com. Trump said he hadn’t spoken to Netanyahu since that perceived betrayal. He also vented that by the end of his term he concluded Netanyahu “didn’t really want peace with the Palestinians” and was using Trump on the Iran issue axios.com. These remarks marked a startling break from Trump’s earlier praise of the Israeli leader.

Netanyahu, for his part, responded diplomatically. While carefully avoiding a direct confrontation, he expressed “high appreciation” for Trump’s contributions to Israel’s security but defended his congratulations to Biden as a necessary part of the U.S.-Israel alliance axios.com. The episode underscored that Trump’s shift was largely personal – rooted in feelings of betrayal – rather than based on policy substance. Still, it hinted at a new, more contentious tone from the former president toward his onetime ally.

Timeline of Key Comments and Shifts

  • March 2020: As president, Trump closely coordinated with Netanyahu on Middle East policy. (For example, Netanyahu stood beside Trump at the White House as Trump unveiled a Mideast peace plan in January 2020 jpost.comjpost.com.) However, behind the scenes, Trump grew frustrated that Netanyahu was reluctant to move toward a peace deal. He later claimed Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas was “more eager” for peace than Netanyahu – a shocking assertion given Abbas’s poor reputation on the U.S. right jpost.comjpost.com.

  • Nov. 7, 2020: Multiple world leaders, including Netanyahu, congratulated President-elect Biden. Trump was furious that Netanyahu was among the first to acknowledge Biden’s win timesofisrael.comaxios.com. Trump saw this as a personal betrayal, given his steadfast support of Netanyahu. He immediately cut off contact with Netanyahu (“I haven’t spoken to him since. F**k him,” Trump said later ) axios.com.

  • Dec. 2021: Trump’s harsh remarks about Netanyahu became public via interviews with journalist Barak Ravid. Trump lambasted Netanyahu for disloyalty and alleged that Netanyahu never truly wanted peace. He cursed Netanyahu (“f*** him”) for the Biden call and recounted that Netanyahu “lied” about seeking Middle East peace jpost.com. Trump even praised Abbas as “like a father” figure who supposedly was more willing to deal – comments that stunned pro-Israel conservatives jpost.com. Netanyahu, then Israel’s opposition leader, responded by reiterating his appreciation for Trump but standing by his decision to congratulate the new U.S. president axios.com.

  • Oct. 7, 2023: Hamas launched a massive terror attack on Israel, killing over 1,300 Israelis and triggering a war. Instead of offering unconditional support, Trump soon criticized Netanyahu’s leadership during the crisis. He told an interviewer that Netanyahu “was not prepared” for the Hamas attack, implying Israeli leadership failure reuters.compolitico.com. At an October 11, 2023 rally in Florida, Trump went further – saying “Bibi Netanyahu let us down” by allegedly backing out last-minute from the 2020 U.S. operation to kill Iranian General Qassem Soleimani politico.com. “That was a very terrible thing,” Trump added, using Netanyahu’s nickname “Bibi” politico.com.

  • Oct. 11–12, 2023: In the same breath, Trump praised the Iran-backed militant group Hezbollah as “very smart” – a remark widely condemned across the political spectrum reuters.compolitico.com. It is virtually unheard of for a prominent American politician, let alone one styling himself a great friend of Israel, to compliment Israel’s bitter enemies in the middle of a war. Israeli officials reacted with outrage: one minister said it was “shameful that a man like that, a former U.S. president, abets propaganda” that hurts Israel’s morale reuters.com. The White House also blasted Trump’s comments as “dangerous and unhinged” reuters.com.

  • Late 2023: Facing blowback, Trump attempted some damage control. He publicly reiterated his longstanding support for Israel in the war. (Reports emerged that Trump even spoke with Netanyahu by phone during the conflict, telling him “Do what you have to do” to defeat Hamas and Hezbollah washingtonpost.comwashingtonpost.com.) A Trump campaign spokesperson emphasized that under Trump there had been “historic peace in the Middle East” and that Trump would “fix the mess” created under President Biden, vowing “Israel will once again be protected” if Trump returns to office washingtonpost.com. In essence, Trump’s team insisted he remains Israel’s best friend – even as Trump personally snubs Netanyahu.

(Note: Netanyahu returned as Prime Minister at the end of 2022. Despite their personal rift, Trump did not openly oppose Netanyahu’s comeback. However, he also did not offer the fulsome praise one might have expected given their past alliance. The real fireworks in their relationship have played out in the comments above.)

U.S. Media and Analysts: Personal Vendetta or Strategy?

Trump’s turn against Netanyahu has been a source of fascination and alarm in U.S. media. Many analysts emphasize that it seems driven less by policy and more by Trump’s personal grievances. The timeline makes this clear: Trump’s anger kindled when Netanyahu acknowledged Biden’s 2020 victory, challenging Trump’s ego and false election claims axios.com. Axios noted Trump “fumed” over Netanyahu’s congratulatory video, viewing it as an act of disloyalty axios.com. This narrative of betrayal is key to understanding Trump’s shift. He prizes personal loyalty and often lashes out at former allies he feels have crossed him – in this case, Netanyahu simply honored democratic norms by accepting the U.S. election result.

Observers have pointed out that Trump’s policy toward Israel hasn’t fundamentally flipped – what changed is his tone toward one man, Netanyahu. Even as Trump touts himself as Israel’s greatest friend, his bitterness toward Netanyahu shows through. The Washington Post remarked that Trump’s recent broadsides were “unexpected” for a Republican frontrunner and deeply intertwined with Trump’s sense of being wronged by Netanyahu politico.compolitico.com. In fact, Trump’s criticisms came “out of the blue” during the Israel-Hamas war, suggesting they were pent-up grievances rather than considered policy critiques politico.com.

Some commentators see a political calculation in Trump’s behavior as well. By highlighting Netanyahu’s lapses (such as failing to anticipate the Hamas attack), Trump draws a contrast that only he, Donald Trump, can truly keep Israel safe. In Trump’s telling, Netanyahu (and by extension President Biden) showed weakness, whereas Trump would project strength. This serves Trump’s 2024 campaign narrative. However, the risk of this strategy was immediately apparent – praising Hezbollah’s savvy and knocking Israel’s leadership is politically taboo. Trump’s GOP rivals pounced on his comments, calling them “absurd” and “inhumane” politico.com. Even stalwart pro-Trump Republicans distanced themselves. “It is never acceptable to praise deranged murderers or undermine one of our closest allies in their darkest hour,” tweeted Georgia’s GOP Gov. Brian Kemp politico.com. These reactions in U.S. media underscore that Trump’s break with Netanyahu is seen as highly unusual and largely self-inflicted by Trump’s penchant for personal score-settling.

Notably, no major American political faction is urging a substantive break from Israel – so Trump’s anti-Netanyahu rhetoric stands out as a personal anomaly. As Halie Soifer, head of the Jewish Democratic Council of America, observed, this episode “shows what we critics have long warned: despite the perception Trump is an ally of Israel, Trump’s ‘America First’ foreign policy does not prioritize Israel” timesofisrael.com. In other words, when Trump’s personal or political interests diverge from Israel’s, he’s willing to deviate from the pro-Israel consensus. This viewpoint suggests Trump’s shift is less an ideological turn against Israel and more a revelation of his transactional approach – Israel is supported only insofar as it aligns with Trump’s own agenda.

Israeli Media and Reactions: Alarm and Adaptation

In Israel, Trump’s abrasive turn against Netanyahu has been met with a mix of shock, concern, and political spin. Netanyahu had long touted his close ties with Trump as a strategic asset for Israel axios.com. Now Israeli commentators are grappling with the specter of a Trump who might not be in lockstep with the Israeli government.

Israeli media across the spectrum have covered Trump’s remarks extensively. The centrist daily Yedioth Ahronoth ran a front-page headline describing Trump’s recent approach as a “policy of surprises” toward Israel timesofisrael.com. A political cartoon in that paper depicted Trump cooking up a soup for a bewildered Netanyahu – symbolizing how Netanyahu finds himself at the mercy of Trump’s whims timesofisrael.com. This reflected a growing realization in Israel that Trump, once seen as utterly reliable for Netanyahu, is now unpredictable.

Right-leaning voices have also expressed concern. Israel Hayom, a newspaper usually favorable to Netanyahu, noted a sense of “bitterness” toward Israel in Washington and asked “whether a new Middle East order is indeed forming…without Israel as an official partner” timesofisrael.com. This striking commentary (by columnist Avraham Ben-Tzvi) suggests fear that Israel could be sidelined if Trump (or the U.S.) pursues deals with regional players like Saudi Arabia or Iran without involving Jerusalem. Such worries were amplified by reports that Trump — disappointed with Netanyahu — was prepared to “make progress…without waiting for Israel” on Middle East issues like a Saudi deal timesofisrael.comtimesofisrael.com. In other words, Israeli analysts are contemplating the once-unthinkable: a U.S. leader proceeding on Mideast initiatives without coordinating with Israel’s government.

On the left, some Israeli commentators see Trump’s snub as Netanyahu reaping what he sowed. Critics of Netanyahu highlight that he tied himself so closely to Trump that Israel’s support in the U.S. became overly partisan. Now, with Trump turning against him, Netanyahu’s judgment is being questioned. A former Israeli general, Yair Golan, commented that Trump — whom Netanyahu saw as a “strategic partner” — has realized “Netanyahu isn’t an asset but a liability” timesofisrael.comtimesofisrael.com. This captures a prevailing sentiment among Netanyahu’s opponents that his personal bond with Trump has backfired. Even Thomas Friedman, a prominent New York Times columnist and frequent critic of both leaders, penned a piece titled “This Israeli Government Is Not Our Ally,” essentially congratulating Trump for apparently recognizing Netanyahu’s failures timesofisrael.comtimesofisrael.com. Friedman argued that Netanyahu put his own interests above Israel’s and the U.S.’s, undermining a potential Saudi-Israeli peace accord – hence Trump was right, in Friedman’s view, to change tack timesofisrael.com.

Meanwhile, Israeli officials have had to respond carefully. When Trump made his October 2023 comments amid the Gaza war, Netanyahu’s government publicly pushed back. Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi lambasted Trump’s remarks as “shameful” and said a former U.S. president who boosts enemy propaganda “cannot be relied on” reuters.com. This is a remarkable statement, given Karhi hails from Netanyahu’s Likud party – it shows even Netanyahu’s camp felt betrayed and needed to defend Israel’s honor. (At the same time, Netanyahu himself notably did not directly confront Trump over those war comments, likely to avoid a deeper feud.) Another Likud lawmaker, Nissim Vaturi, struck a more cautious tone – he reminded Trump that “he was elected to the presidency riding on the wings of support for Israel,” a thinly veiled warning not to turn his back on the Jewish statetimesofisrael.com. (Vaturi later deleted that unusually critical tweet.) These reactions reveal Israeli officials’ balancing act: condemning Trump’s slights against their country, yet mindful of Trump’s influence over future U.S. policy.

Reactions from Trump’s Allies and Pro-Israel Figures

Trump’s anti-Netanyahu turn has also rattled some of his own allies in the U.S., especially among the evangelical Christian and Jewish Republican base that strongly supports Israel. Immediately after Trump’s “f*** Netanyahu” outburst became public in 2021, several pro-Israel evangelicals and conservatives voiced dismay. Mike Evans, a prominent evangelical leader who had been an adviser to Trump and a long-time Netanyahu supporter, wrote an open letter to Trump warning him that “Benjamin Netanyahu has much greater support among evangelicals in America than you” jpost.comjpost.com. Evans bluntly cautioned Trump that attacking Netanyahu could be a “game-changer” that alienates Trump’s Christian Zionist base jpost.com. This was a striking rebuke from an erstwhile ally. Similarly, Morton Klein, president of the Zionist Organization of America and typically a strong Trump backer, said it was “wrong and even absurd” for Trump to praise Palestinian leader Abbas and blame Netanyahu, calling Trump’s behavior “more than disappointing” jpost.comjpost.com. Klein lamented that Trump’s words “reinforce people’s feelings that Trump has a serious personality problem” jpost.com. Such criticism from staunch pro-Israel advocates showed how Trump’s personal vendetta was troubling even to his friends.

That said, many in Trump’s orbit have tried to downplay the feud. Some evangelical and Jewish Republican figures argued that whatever Trump says in anger, his actual record of pro-Israel actions speaks louder. The influential group Christians United for Israel signaled that evangelical support for Israel “transcends politics and personalities,” implying Trump’s spat with Netanyahu wouldn’t diminish their support for pro-Israel policies jpost.com. Republican Jewish donors and insiders largely stuck with Trump, noting that he delivered on Israel’s core issues in office (Jerusalem, Golan, Iran, etc.) jpost.com. In their eyes, Trump’s irritable comments were an unfortunate outburst but not a deal-breaker. This pragmatic view – focusing on policy results over rhetoric – likely helped limit any immediate political fallout for Trump among GOP voters.

Indeed, by the time Trump entered the 2024 presidential race, the Netanyahu issue had not significantly dented his standing in Republican polls. When Trump’s October 2023 Hezbollah remarks drew fire, most Republican officials condemned the content of the comments but stopped short of abandoning Trump himself. For example, Senator Lindsey Graham – ordinarily a close Trump ally and fierce Israel defender – expressed disapproval by saying voters would judge Trump’s words, while reaffirming that he (Graham) still expects strong U.S. support for Israel regardless politico.compolitico.com. Other allies like House GOP members simply stayed quiet, not amplifying Trump’s attack on Netanyahu. This cautious response suggests that Trump’s allies see his Netanyahu-bashing as a bug, not a feature – an impulsive episode they need to manage or ignore, rather than a new principle they endorse.

Substantive Rift or Political Strategy?

The big question is whether Trump’s break with Netanyahu represents a genuine substantive shift in his Middle East outlook, or merely a transient political strategy (or even personal pique). Evidence suggests it is largely the latter. Trump has not renounced his core pro-Israel policies or the U.S.-Israel alliance. In fact, he continues to boast of being Israel’s best friend and insists he would protect Israel’s security more robustly than the current U.S. administration washingtonpost.com. There is no indication that Trump has adopted positions favorable to Israel’s adversaries in any sustained way – his Hezbollah comment, while shocking, appears to have been off-the-cuff praise of an enemy’s cunning rather than endorsement of their cause. The substance of Trump’s policy positions (support for tough action against Iran, support for moving the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem, etc.) remains unchanged and in line with right-wing pro-Israel thinking.

What has changed is Trump’s willingness to publicly split with Israel’s leader for personal reasons. This can have policy implications if Trump returns to power – for example, he might be less inclined to consult or coordinate with a Netanyahu-led government that he mistrusts. As one Israeli analyst put it, “the main expression” of the current bitterness is an American tendency to “advance along routes that bypass Jerusalem” timesofisrael.com. In practice, that could mean a more unilateral U.S. approach to Middle East initiatives, without the previous deference to Israel’s positions. This shift is not born of a new ideological agenda against Israel, but from Trump’s “America First”, transactional instinct: he supports Israel when it aligns with U.S. interests (and his interests), but he won’t sacrifice his political aims for the sake of personal friendship or Israeli preferences timesofisrael.com.

Several commentators note that Trump’s attitude is actually consistent with his worldview. Michael Koplow of the Israel Policy Forum observed that Trump will happily “give Israel all of the support it wants, provided that it doesn’t cost too much and doesn’t require tradeoffs elsewhere” timesofisrael.com. In other words, Trump’s backing comes with conditions – if Israel’s needs conflict with Trump’s plans (or if its leader offends him), Trump may choose to distance himself. This looks more like a strategic calculus (albeit one driven by ego) than a wholesale policy reversal. It suggests Trump is making a political bet that he can both maintain a pro-Israel record and pressure Netanyahu (or any Israeli government) to fall in line with his preferences. For example, by withholding the warmth he once showed, Trump may be signaling to Netanyahu that Israel should “do more” (whether in confronting Iran, or being more compliant with Trump’s ideas) to earn U.S. favor. Some in Israel interpret Trump’s stance as effectively telling Jerusalem: if you insist on a course I don’t like (such as how Netanyahu handles Gaza or hesitates on a Saudi deal), then go ahead, but without me timesofisrael.com.

In sum, Trump’s recent anti-Netanyahu rhetoric appears politically strategic and highly personal, rather than a true change in U.S. policy toward Israel. He has not turned “anti-Israel” – he has turned against Netanyahu himself. The shift is mostly in style and relationship, not in strategic objectives. Trump still seeks credit as a peacemaker and tough-on-Iran leader, but he is also ensuring everyone knows he felt betrayed by Netanyahu. It is a reminder that Trump’s foreign policy can be erratic and driven by personal loyalty tests. As the White House deputy press secretary quipped amid the Hezbollah controversy, it’s baffling for any American leader to praise an Iran-backed terror group as “smart”reuters.com – the implication being that Trump’s comments were driven by his own grudges, not U.S. interests.

Conclusion

Donald Trump’s recent broadsides against Benjamin Netanyahu mark a remarkable departure from their once-chummy alliance. The rift unfolded in stages – from Trump’s fury at Netanyahu’s congratulations to Biden in 2020, to his 2021 “f* him**” eruption, to the 2023 war-time critiques of Netanyahu being unprepared and disloyal. U.S. and Israeli observers largely interpret these moves as a product of Trump’s personality and political calculations. American media emphasize the personal vendetta and see little sign of a principled policy shift away from supporting Israel axios.comtimesofisrael.com. In Israel, there is anxiety that Trump’s ire toward Netanyahu could translate into less coordination or more surprises, but also an understanding that Israel cannot put all its faith in one man’s favor timesofisrael.comtimesofisrael.com.

So far, the change appears more symbolic and strategic than substantive. Trump seems to be testing how far he can go in separating his brand from Netanyahu’s without alienating the pro-Israel base. The episode illustrates Trump’s unique approach: he intertwines personal loyalty with international alliances. Netanyahu, famously nicknamed “King Bibi” at home, now finds himself in the unusual position of being on the receiving end of Trump’s barbs. Whether this feud is temporary or lasting may depend on political expediency. Should circumstances align (for instance, a common interest in confronting Iran or clinching a grand diplomatic deal), Trump could well embrace Netanyahu again – but on Trump’s terms. Until then, the once ironclad Trump-Netanyahu partnership has clearly frayed, serving as a case study in how international relationships can hinge on individual whims and perceived slights as much as on national interestsreuters.compolitico.com.

Sources:

 

Trump’s SHOCKING Turn Against Netanyahu! Is It Real? w/ Catherine Austin Fitts

 

The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.


Tom Homan sends blistering

warning to NJ Democrats

 

On May 10, 2025, former acting ICE Director Tom Homan issued a stern warning to New Jersey Democrats following the arrest of Newark Mayor Ras Baraka at an ICE detention facility. 

 

During an appearance on Fox News, Homan criticized the mayor's actions, stating, "He's not very smart," and emphasized that the facility is "about due process."

Mediaite+2Mediaite+2Mediaite+2

 

Homan further warned that any elected officials who impede ICE operations by trespassing or interfering with federal enforcement could face legal consequences. He asserted, "They can stand out and scream all they want. They can trespass, they'll be arrested. If they impede, they will be arrested."

 

Homan's message reflects a broader frustration with progressive officials who undermine federal immigration enforcement in favor of political theatrics. Conservatives argue that public servants should uphold the rule of law, not obstruct it for the sake of virtue signaling. Sanctuary policies and staged protests at ICE facilities are seen as reckless and disrespectful to the agencies tasked with maintaining national security. Homan's warning is viewed not just as a legal boundary, but a line in the sand against growing lawlessness fueled by partisan agendas.

Many on the Right believe it’s time for consequences when elected leaders break the law in pursuit of open-border policies. 

Mediaite

 

This incident has intensified the debate over immigration enforcement and the role of local officials in federal operations. Homan's remarks underscore the administration's commitment to strict immigration policies and the enforcement of federal laws.

New York Post+1New York Post+1

 

For more details, you can watch the full segment here:

Tom Homan sends blistering warning to NJ Democrats

 

The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.


India and Pakistan accuse each

other of violating ceasefire agreement

 

On May 10, 2025, India and Pakistan agreed to a U.S.-brokered ceasefire aimed at de-escalating tensions following a deadly terrorist attack in Indian-administered Kashmir that killed 26 civilians. However, within hours of the agreement, both nations accused each other of violating the truce.

The Guardian+1Reuters+1Reuters

 

Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri reported "repeated violations" by Pakistan, citing explosions and drone activity in Srinagar and other areas of Indian-controlled Kashmir. Pakistan denied these allegations, asserting its commitment to the ceasefire and accusing India of initiating hostilities. The situation remains volatile, with both sides exchanging fire and international mediators urging restraint. Cadena SER+5Al Jazeera+5POLITICO+5AP News+2Reuters+2CBS News+2

 

The ceasefire was intended to halt weeks of escalating violence, including missile and drone attacks across the Line of Control.

 Despite the agreement, the renewed hostilities underscore the fragility of peace efforts in the region.

AP News+1New York Post+1

 

For more detailed coverage, you can watch the following news report:

India accuses Pakistan of violating ceasefire agreement

 

The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.


WOKE Transgender HUMILIATED

by GENIUS Conservative on CNN

 

Transgender meets Scott Jennings and instantly regrets it.

 

 

The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.


ICE ARREST Democrat Mayor LIVE on TV

Ras Baraka Mayor of Newark, New Jersey arrested at ICE detention center

 

On May 9, 2025, Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, a Democratic gubernatorial candidate, was arrested outside the Delaney Hall ICE detention facility in Newark, New Jersey. Baraka was accompanying Democratic Representatives Rob Menendez Jr., Bonnie Watson Coleman, and LaMonica McIver, who were conducting an oversight visit to the facility. While the representatives were permitted entry, Baraka was instructed to remain outside the fenced area. Despite complying, he was subsequently arrested by ICE agents for trespassing.

YouTube+15New York Magazine+15The Daily Beast+15CBS News+8The Daily Beast+8Fox News+8CBS News+2WSJ+2The Daily Beast+2

The arrest sparked immediate criticism from Democratic lawmakers and civil rights advocates. Governor Phil Murphy and Senators Cory Booker and Andy Kim condemned the arrest as politically motivated and an abuse of federal power. They argued that Baraka's actions were part of a lawful oversight effort and that his detention was an attempt to intimidate elected officials.

The Daily Beast+1The Guardian+1

Interim U.S. Attorney Alina Habba defended the arrest, stating that Baraka had ignored multiple warnings to leave the premises and committed trespassing. The Department of Homeland Security claimed that the group attempted to "storm" the facility, a characterization disputed by the lawmakers involved.

The Guardian+9The Daily Beast+9ABC News+9WSJ+9AP News+9ABC News+9

Baraka was released later that evening and is scheduled to appear in court on May 15. The incident has intensified debates over immigration enforcement and the role of federal authorities in local jurisdictions.

POLITICO+1People.com+1The Daily Beast

 

ICE ARREST Democrat Mayor LIVE on TV After They Storm ICE Facility in Protest

Many defended the actions of ICE, pointing out that no public official is above the law. Critics noted that the mayor was warned multiple times to vacate a secured federal area and chose to remain, effectively challenging the authority of law enforcement. They argue that Democrats often claim immunity under the guise of "oversight," while simultaneously undermining immigration enforcement operations. The arrest represents a long-overdue stance against political grandstanding and the continued erosion of federal security boundaries in favor of optics-driven protests.

 

The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.


“Where Is Everyone?” — China’s Cities Are Empty, Funerals Outnumber Weddings 17 to 1

 

Ghost Villages, Empty Cities, Fake Births— What is China Hiding?

 

In this investigative video, we uncover shocking evidence from citizen journalists, real estate vloggers, and leaked demographic data that suggest China’s true population may be far lower than the official data.

 

Funerals now outnumber weddings 17 to 1. Entire apartment buildings stand dark and deserted.

 

Villages once filled with hundreds now have only a handful of elderly residents left behind.

What’s causing this collapse? And why is no one talking about it?

 

The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.


Israeli police cracked down on Hasidic Jews in the Jerusalem neighborhood

 

Many of the Hasidim in Mea Shearim are staunch anti-Zionists and express solidarity with the Palestinian people against the Israeli government.

 

Jimmy and Americans’ Comedian Kurt Metzger discuss the beatings and arrests these peace-loving people are subjected to for opposing genocide in Gaza.

 

Jews have lived there for millennia—well, not all, like Hidic, who hasn't been there that long—but the Jews who were there originally never turned on Israel. They never wanted Zionists there in the first place. That’s why when people say, “Oh, the Jews,” it becomes a complicated statement.

 

There’s no single, unified “Jewish” viewpoint, especially when it comes to this issue. The people who lived there didn’t want this situation, and they’ve been persecuted like natives—because they are. They’re native Israelis.

So why wouldn’t they feel hurt when they’re treated this way in their own country just for having a different opinion? Honestly, they might as well be living in the United States, Germany, or England right now, because that’s what’s happening—if you express a different opinion, this is how you’re treated.

The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.


LIVE: The Glenn Beck Program | Hour One 5/9/25

 

Glenn discusses the America Pope and the future of the Catholic faith.

 

The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.


100 years?

 

The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.


Thank you,

President Trump!


Pepperidge Farms Remembers..


Ilhan Omar GETS EMBARRASSED After TRASHING Americans on National TV!

 

Ilhan Omar once again sparks outrage by claiming that white men are the biggest threat to America—Officer Tatum isn’t having it.

 

In this video, Tatum calls out the double standard in media and politics that would never tolerate such rhetoric if the roles were reversed. He also dives into a deeper discussion about religious ideology, radical Islam, and why America must be defended against internal threats. Plus, he breaks down the cultural divide between loving this country and trying to tear it down from within.

The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.


Trump Says US Will Stop Bombing Houthis After Agreement Struck

On May 6, 2025, President Donald Trump announced that the United States would cease its bombing campaign against Yemen's Houthi rebels.

 This decision follows an agreement in which the Iran-aligned group committed to halting attacks on Red Sea shipping lanes. The ceasefire, brokered by Oman, aims to de-escalate tensions in the region and ensure the safety of vital maritime routes. 

President Trump stated that the Houthis had "capitulated" and expressed a desire to stop fighting, leading the U.S. to honor their commitment by ending airstrikes. However, the Houthis have indicated that while they will cease attacks on U.S. vessels, they intend to continue hostilities against Israel.

The U.S. military campaign, known as Operation Rough Rider, began in mid-March 2025 in response to Houthi attacks on international shipping. Over the course of the operation, more than 1,000 Houthi targets were struck, resulting in significant casualties and infrastructure damage.

While the ceasefire marks a potential turning point in the conflict, its durability remains uncertain, particularly given the Houthis' continued aggression toward Israel. The situation underscores the complex dynamics of Middle Eastern geopolitics and the challenges of achieving lasting peace in the region.

 

A Brutal Truth Fringe Theory;

 

Fringe theories and alternative geopolitical commentators have reacted to the ceasefire announcement between the U.S. and the Houthis with a mix of suspicion and deeper analysis. Here's a breakdown of what some in the fringe and alternative circles are suggesting:

1. Strategic De-escalation, Not Surrender
Some argue the term “capitulated” is misleading. Fringe analysts suggest the Houthis may be temporarily pulling back from attacking U.S. interests not out of defeat, but strategic necessity. They theorize that the Houthis, backed by Iran, are choosing to shift focus entirely toward Israel in alignment with broader regional objectives rather than truly standing down.

2. U.S.-Iran Backchannel Communications
Alternative foreign policy theorists speculate this ceasefire was not solely the result of direct negotiation with the Houthis but was brokered indirectly via Iranian intermediaries. Some propose that secret backchannel diplomacy between Trump’s administration and Iran may have involved broader concessions, possibly linked to oil routes, sanctions relief, or future Middle East alignments.

3. Controlled Conflict Management
A recurring theme in fringe theory is the concept of “managed conflict zones.” Some claim the Houthi shift away from U.S. targets allows for the illusion of diplomatic progress while redirecting conflict toward Israel, thereby serving a dual geopolitical purpose: reducing direct U.S. military engagement while inflaming tensions that justify continued surveillance, arms sales, and military readiness in the region.

4. Distraction from Domestic Agendas
There are also theories that this announcement is timed to serve political narratives at home. By claiming a diplomatic "win" with the Houthis, Trump may be consolidating his foreign policy credentials during an election season. Some conspiracy-leaning sources suggest that the move could also distract from domestic controversies or legal battles.

5. Israel as the Next Target in a Proxy War
Fringe Middle East observers highlight that the Houthi focus on Israel is part of a broader proxy war narrative. According to this view, the Houthis, Hezbollah, and Iranian-backed militias are positioning Israel as the main symbol of Western influence in the region, and therefore a common enemy. These theorists claim this may escalate into a multi-front war engineered to trigger wider global responses, perhaps even fulfilling perceived "end-times" scenarios among certain religious or eschatological theorists.

6. The "False Peace" Argument
Among fringe religious theorists, particularly those interpreting events through prophetic or biblical lenses, some argue this ceasefire is a temporary "false peace." They warn it could be a setup for a larger betrayal or a major regional conflict under the guise of short-term stability.

 
 
The Guardian
US agrees ceasefire with Houthis in Yemen after dozens killed in airstrikes
Today
 
New York Post
Trump says US 'will stop' bombing Yemen's Houthis, claims 'they don't want to fight anymore'
Today

 

The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.


Jerusalem Wildfire Contained After 30-Hour Battle | 18 Arrested for Arson

Jerusalem and its surrounding areas have recently experienced a significant wildfire event. Beginning on April 30, 2025, massive wildfires erupted in the Judean Mountains west of Jerusalem, leading to a national emergency declaration by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The fires scorched over 6,000 acres, forced the evacuation of more than 10,000 residents, and disrupted major transportation routes, including the closure of the main highway between Jerusalem and Tel Aviv.

Jerusalem Wildfire LIVE: Israel Appeals for International Aid Over ‘largest Ever’ Blaze | N18G

The blazes were exacerbated by high temperatures, low humidity, and strong winds, which caused the fires to spread rapidly through forests and agricultural lands. Firefighting efforts involved over 160 ground crews, 12 aircraft, and assistance from the Israel Defense Forces. International support also arrived, with countries like Italy, Croatia, and France sending firefighting planes to aid in containment efforts. 

Arson Arrests in Massive Israel Wildfires | CBN NewsWatch May 1, 2025

While the fires have been largely brought under control, investigations into their causes are ongoing. Authorities are examining factors such as climate conditions and potential human involvement, including arson. The incident has sparked discussions about emergency preparedness and the impacts of climate change on wildfire frequency and intensity in the region.  

Massive Firestorm in Jerusalem ❗❗😱 Prophecy is Happening..

Jerusalem Wildfire Contained After 30-Hour Battle | 18 Arrested for Arson

As of early May 2025, Israeli authorities have not publicly released the names of individuals arrested in connection with the recent wildfires near Jerusalem. While Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced that 18 people had been detained on suspicion of arson, police sources have indicated that only three arrests have been confirmed, with investigations ongoing. One individual, identified as 19-year-old Omar Dar Daoud, was arrested near Modi'in on suspicion of nationalistically motivated arson.

Authorities have not disclosed further details about the other detainees, and the exact number of arrests remains a subject of clarification. The investigation into the cause of the wildfires continues, with officials exploring various leads, including potential arson and other contributing factors.

 

The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.


Why was Mike Waltz fired from the white house?

 

Mike Waltz was dismissed from his role as National Security Adviser by President Donald Trump on May 1, 2025, due to a combination of security lapses and policy disagreements.

 

Trump Fires ISRAELI MOLE Inside The Trump Administration!

 

Key Reasons for Waltz's Dismissal:

  • "Signal gate" Security Breach: Waltz inadvertently added journalist Jeffrey Goldberg to a Signal group chat where sensitive U.S. military plans regarding Yemen were discussed. This incident raised serious concerns about operational security and adherence to protocols. 

  • Unauthorized Coordination with Israel: Waltz reportedly engaged in discussions with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu about potential military action against Iran without President Trump's approval. This move was seen as undermining the administration's diplomatic efforts and raised questions about Waltz's alignment with U.S. foreign policy objectives. 

  • Policy Divergences: Waltz's hawkish stance on Iran and support for increased military aid to Ukraine conflicted with President Trump's preference for diplomatic solutions and a more restrained foreign policy approach.

Aftermath:

Following his dismissal, President Trump announced plans to nominate Waltz as the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations. In the interim, Secretary of State Marco Rubio was appointed to serve concurrently as National Security Adviser, marking a significant consolidation of foreign policy roles within the administration.

 

This leadership change reflects a broader shift in the Trump administration toward prioritizing loyalty and centralized control over foreign policy decisions.

 

The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.


How many states have banned Chem-trailing in our sky?

 

Florida bans chemtrails

 

As of May 2025, Tennessee is the only U.S. state that has officially enacted a law banning geoengineering practices often associated with "chemtrails." In April 2024, Tennessee passed legislation prohibiting the intentional release of chemicals into the atmosphere with the purpose of affecting weather, temperature, or sunlight intensity.

Jalopnik+4Wikipedia+4Business Insider+4

 

Other states, including Florida and Arizona, have introduced or advanced similar bills targeting geoengineering activities. Florida's Senate approved a measure in April 2025 that would ban the injection or dispersion of substances into the atmosphere for climate modification purposes. Arizona's Senate has also advanced a bill aimed at prohibiting solar radiation management techniques. However, these bills have not yet become law.

Florida Phoenix+1Wikipedia+1Florida Phoenix+1Florida Phoenix+1Arizona Capitol Times+2Arizona Investigative Reporting+2AP News+2

 

It's important to note that the scientific community widely regards the "chemtrails" theory as a conspiracy theory without empirical evidence. 

The visible trails left by aircraft, known as contrails, are understood to be composed primarily of water vapor and are not linked to weather modification efforts.

The GuardianArizona Investigative Reporting+5LiveNOW+5The Independent Florida Alligator+5

 

In summary, while multiple states have considered legislation related to geoengineering practices, only Tennessee has enacted a law banning such activities as of now.

LiveNOW+1Business Insider+1

 

The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.


They didn't take the news very well 😂

 

If NPR were truly politically neutral, Trump wouldn’t have much ground to stand on. I’ve listened to NPR — and it’s clear that their coverage leans heavily to the Left.

 

No one is saying NPR and PBS can’t exist. The issue is whether taxpayers should be footing the bill for it. It’s not an attack on their freedom of speech; it’s simply saying they should be responsible for funding their own narratives.

 

Since when did PBS and NPR become the only voices in American media?

Where in the Constitution does it say taxpayers are obligated to subsidize the press?


The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.


How many countries is Israel attacking?

ALERT: MAJOR WAR COMING IN THE MIDDLE EAST!

 

As of May 2025, Israel has conducted military operations in several countries and territories, primarily targeting areas associated with Hamas, Hezbollah, and other groups. These operations have impacted numerous regions, including:

1. Gaza Strip (Occupied Palestinian Territory)

  • Israel has carried out extensive airstrikes and ground operations across the Gaza Strip, affecting areas such as Rafah, Khan Yunis, Gaza City, Deir al-Balah, and Beit Hanoun.

  • These operations have resulted in significant casualties and widespread destruction of infrastructure .Wikipedia+1Wikipedia+1

2. Lebanon

  • Israeli military actions have targeted multiple regions in Lebanon, including southern areas like Bint Jbeil and Aita al-Shaab, as well as parts of the Beqaa Valley and suburbs of Beirut.

  • These operations have led to numerous casualties and displacement of civilians .Wikipedia+1Wikipedia+1

3. Syria

4. Iran

    • In response to regional tensions, Israel has launched attacks targeting Iranian military facilities and infrastructure.

    • These operations have been part of broader efforts to counter perceived threats from Iranian-backed groups .Council on Foreign Relations+1Wikipedia+1Al Jazeera

5. Yemen

  • Israel has conducted military actions in Yemen, focusing on areas controlled by groups aligned with Iran.

  • These operations are part of Israel's strategy to mitigate threats from Iranian influence in the region .

In summary, Israel's military operations since October 2023 have spanned multiple countries and territories, targeting various groups and resulting in significant regional impacts.

 

The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.


I Guess a Cup of Blood and $8,000 is not Enough to Alert Everyone That This Man is a Fraud

 

Read your scriptures, Christians! He is not the Successor of Jesus!

 

This cult leader is nothing new. He is just a scammer, a liar, and a deceiver. Exposing the "Mahdi Has Appeared" Scam


This Man Claims To Be The New Messiah And People Are FREAKING OUT!

 

The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.


Trump RUNS CIRCLES AROUND DERANGED

Meet The Press Anchor Trying To Trap

Him With GOTCHA Questions!

 

 

 

Why does a child need 30 plastic dolls?

 

I thought the left was concerned about reducing carbon footprints. Most parents would rather put that money toward groceries, bills, or something that actually builds value.

 

It’s pretty telling—Biden avoids questions from his own friendly media, while Trump faces off with opposition outlets just as often as conservative ones. That takes a strong, confident mindset.

 

 

The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.


President Donald Trump announced plans to reopen and expand the historic Alcatraz prison in San Francisco Bay

On May 4, 2025, President Donald Trump announced an executive directive to reopen and significantly expand the former Alcatraz Federal Penitentiary, a facility located on Alcatraz Island in San Francisco Bay. Once home to some of America’s most notorious criminals, including Al Capone and George “Machine Gun” Kelly, the prison was originally shut down in 1963 due to high operational costs and deteriorating infrastructure. Since then, Alcatraz has been managed by the National Park Service as a designated National Historic Landmark and popular tourist destination, drawing over a million visitors annually.

Trump’s directive charges multiple federal agencies—the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Department of Justice, FBI, and Department of Homeland Security—with the task of restoring the island facility for operational use. The former president described the intended use of the revamped prison as a place to detain “America’s most ruthless and violent offenders,” which he claims modern detention centers are failing to adequately isolate. Framing the move as a bold return to law, order, and justice, Trump signaled that his administration would take a more aggressive posture on violent crime, repeat offenders, and what he termed “urban domestic threats.”

President Trump says he will reopen notorious Alcatraz Island prison in San Francisco

The proposed reopening has drawn strong reactions from across the political spectrum and has become a flashpoint in California politics. Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi dismissed the plan as unserious, highlighting the symbolic and practical value Alcatraz now holds as a protected historical site and cultural landmark. California State Senator Scott Wiener criticized the initiative as economically and environmentally unsound, pointing out that the island supports jobs tied to tourism and would require enormous investment to reverse decades of national park development and restore outdated prison infrastructure.

Critics also emphasized that Alcatraz was closed in part because of the excessive costs associated with running an island-based prison. It had been nearly three times more expensive to operate than comparable mainland institutions, largely due to the logistical challenges of transporting supplies, staff, and inmates by boat. Environmental groups noted that Alcatraz’s status as part of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area would likely lead to legal challenges, requiring environmental impact assessments and congressional approval to override its current protected status.

Despite logistical concerns, the Bureau of Prisons has stated it will carry out the president’s directive in coordination with other federal agencies. However, analysts say the feasibility of restoring the island prison depends on overcoming a complex web of legal, financial, and environmental obstacles. As of now, no formal construction or redevelopment plans have been released to the public. The announcement is being seen by some as a symbolic political gesture amid the 2024 campaign cycle, reinforcing Trump’s focus on crime and national security.

 

Sources
 
 
New York Post
Trump orders reopening of notorious Alcatraz prison to lock away the 'dregs of society'
Today
 
The Daily Beast
Trump Takes Don Jr.'s Advice With Plan to Reopen Infamous Prison
Today
 

The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research


China Hit by Massive Fires and Explosions, China Construction Bank Building Engulfed in Smoke

 

 

 

A fire broke out at the Fuzhou Construction Bank building in Fujian on May 1st, with heavy smoke at the scene. However, so far, all media and websites in China have tightly blocked any reports, which seems very strange.

 

Also, in the video are strange phenomenon such as buildings with no lights on reflecting lights on water.


The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.


Trump is winning over an entire GENERATION.

 

@yonibennett6201 -- I am thoroughly disgusted with the media blaming Trump for the economy when he's only been on the job 100 days! No, this is still Biden's economy... We're not dumb.

 

@OmegaZyion -- I'm calling BS on that supposed Trump supporter that regrets his vote. If you didn't realize that Trump was going to shut down government waste and tariff all the countries taking advantage of the US (which is pretty much all of them), then you weren't paying attention to his campaign. He's doing exactly what he promised. Which is more than most politicians who promise great things but never deliver.

The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.


The Tariffs Hurt. China is hurting.

 

 

Wages owed since January. The people of China are behind on Rent and Bills. And that is just scratching the outside of the eggshell...

 

@carldilbone710 -- Now China is seeing what Americans went through when companies moved out for cheaper labor! Let's hope this is the straw that broke the ccp's back?!🤔 China has a long way to go to regain its honor and integrity with other countries...

 

@jollygoodfellow3957 -- "In a land where justice is outlawed, the just must become outlaws."

The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.


The Dimming

 

 

The Dimming

 

 

The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.


Candace Owens is calling out Donald Trump — and she’s not wrong to do so.

 

The U.S. Constitution protects the right to free speech, not selective speech. Yet what we’re seeing in America right now is a troubling trend: voices critical of Israel are being silenced or vilified. Israel is a foreign nation, not the 51st U.S. state, but it's being treated as if it’s above reproach — as if criticism equals betrayal.

Supporting the MAGA movement doesn’t mean blind allegiance to everything Trump says or does. I voted for Trump because I believe in putting America first — our Constitution, our freedoms, our people. But that doesn’t mean I’ll choose loyalty to Trump over principles when the issue is clear.

Whether Trump has been misinformed by Israeli intelligence or there’s more going on behind the scenes, something doesn’t sit right. And Candace Owens is raising questions that deserve answers.

Watch the show and decide for yourselves.


The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.


Oh Wow... Lookie What we got Here...!

 

Bodycam Video Released of Kilmar Abrego Garcia Suspected HUMAN SMUGGLING Traffic Stop

 

Is it me.... Or is Kilmar looking a bit green around the gills in this video...?

 

The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.


New orders are crashing, home sales are collapsing, and banks are hemorrhaging... it's China's warning to the world as global chaos begins.

 

China's economy is facing significant challenges in 2025, marked by declining export orders, a collapsing real estate market, and mounting stress within its banking sector. These developments not only threaten China's domestic stability but also have far-reaching implications for the global economy.

 

😱 China Declares EMERGENCY—Frightening WARNING to the World!

 

Export Orders Decline

 

In April 2025, China's export orders experienced a substantial drop, influenced by the imposition of steep tariffs by the United States. President Donald Trump's administration implemented tariffs as high as 145% on Chinese goods, prompting retaliatory measures from Beijing, including 125% tariffs on U.S. products. This trade conflict has led to significant disruptions in supply chains and a decrease in manufacturing activity, with China's official manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index falling to 49.0, indicating contraction. AP News+1The Guardian+1The Guardian+2Reuters+2AP News+2

 

Real Estate Market Collapse

 

China's real estate sector, once a pillar of its economic growth, is undergoing a severe downturn. The crisis, which began with the default of major developer Evergrande, has expanded to include other significant firms like Country Garden and Vanke. Home prices have plummeted, and the market's instability has eroded household wealth and consumer confidence. WikipediaBloomberg+1Bloomberg+1

 

Banking Sector Strain

 

The financial strain from the real estate collapse is impacting China's banking sector. In 2024, numerous small banks faced insolvency, leading to a wave of consolidations and closures. The ongoing property market issues have resulted in a rise in non-performing loans, further weakening the financial system. Paypers

Global Implications

 

China's economic challenges are reverberating globally. The slowdown in Chinese manufacturing and exports affects international supply chains and trade balances. Additionally, the depreciation of the Chinese yuan and shifts in investment flows are influencing global financial markets.TalkMarkets+6WIRED+6Investor's Business Daily+6

As China navigates these economic headwinds, the international community closely monitors the situation, given the interconnectedness of global economies and the potential for broader financial instability.

 

The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.


Mutiny in China – Young Chinese TURN AGAINST Xi Jinping

 

Mutiny in China – Young Chinese TURN AGAINST Xi Jinping

 

In recent months, China has witnessed a surge in youth-led protests, signaling growing discontent with President Xi Jinping's leadership. These demonstrations, reminiscent of the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests, have been fueled by a combination of economic challenges, political repression, and a desire for greater personal freedoms.

The tragic death of 17-year-old Dang Changxin in Pucheng, Shaanxi Province, served as a catalyst for widespread unrest. Dang's death, under suspicious circumstances, and the subsequent swift closure of the investigation by authorities, sparked outrage among students and citizens alike. Protests erupted, with demonstrators demanding transparency and accountability. Clashes with riot police ensued, leading to numerous injuries and arrests. news

Beyond this incident, a broader movement has taken shape. In Chengdu, a lone protester displayed banners calling for political reform and criticizing unchecked power, reflecting a growing desire for democratic governance. These acts of defiance, though met with swift crackdowns, highlight a shift in the public's willingness to challenge the status Quo.  China Digital Times (CDT)

Economic factors also play a significant role. High youth unemployment rates and limited opportunities have led many young Chinese to adopt a "let it rot" attitude, expressing apathy towards traditional societal expectations. 

 

This sentiment, coupled with frustration over strict government policies, has intensified calls for change. Business & Finance News

While the Chinese government continues to suppress dissent through censorship and surveillance, the persistence of these protests indicates a deep-rooted desire for reform among the younger generation. As the situation evolves, the international community watches closely, considering the potential implications for China's future trajectory.

 

While China's government frequently promotes its global economic dominance and technological progress, a closer look reveals growing internal strains that contradict that outward image. Several key indicators suggest that the country is facing mounting challenges:

 

1. Economic Slowdown
China’s once double-digit GDP growth has slowed significantly. Official data reported 5.2% growth in 2023, but many analysts believe the real figure could be lower due to manipulated statistics. The property sector, once a major growth engine, has collapsed under the weight of debt and oversupply—Evergrande and Country Garden being the most notable examples. Youth unemployment soared so high that Beijing stopped reporting it altogether in 2023, signaling concern over domestic perception.

2. Demographic Crisis
China's population is shrinking. In 2022, it reported its first population decline in 60 years. Projections suggest that its labor force will continue to contract, straining pensions and social programs. The country now faces the prospect of growing old before it grows rich, a major hurdle for its long-term development.

 

3. Authoritarian Controls and Censorship
Beijing's increasingly repressive policies under Xi Jinping have driven capital and talent out of the country. The clampdown on the tech sector, education companies, and outspoken entrepreneurs has stifled innovation. Foreign firms are growing wary of investing due to arbitrary enforcement of laws, surveillance, and political risks.

 

4. Global Pushback and De-coupling
Geopolitical tensions, especially with the U.S., have led to trade restrictions, chip bans, and companies relocating supply chains out of China. Western democracies are increasingly scrutinizing China’s influence operations, forced labor practices, and alignment with authoritarian regimes like Russia and Iran. Many nations are now actively “de-risking” their economic exposure.

 

5. Public Discontent
From the 2022 “White Paper” protests to the current unrest among youth, dissatisfaction is simmering beneath the surface. Movements like "Tang Ping" (lying flat) and "Bai Lan" (let it rot) reflect a generation disillusioned with their prospects. These sentiments challenge the party's narrative of national rejuvenation.

 

While China remains a major power, its foundation is less stable than often advertised. The combination of economic fragility, demographic pressure, international resistance, and internal unrest presents serious challenges to the CCP's long-term vision. For now, the government maintains a tight grip, but the cracks are increasingly visible.

 

Sources:

 

The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.


Alberta Inches Closer to Secession Vote as Province Eases Referendum Rules

Alberta's growing secessionist sentiment is rooted in a mix of political, economic, and cultural frustrations that many residents feel have been ignored or undermined by the federal government in Ottawa.

 

The province has long viewed itself as an economic engine for Canada, largely due to its vast oil and gas reserves. Yet, over the past two decades, particularly under federal Liberal leadership, Albertans have expressed mounting anger over energy regulations, equalization payments, and what they perceive as a federal bias against their industries and values.

 

At the heart of the movement is the belief that federal environmental policies, including carbon taxes and pipeline restrictions, disproportionately harm Alberta’s economy while benefiting other provinces, especially Quebec. Many Albertans also feel that federal transfer payments unfairly redistribute their wealth to other regions without equivalent returns in infrastructure or political influence. These frustrations are amplified by repeated clashes over resource development, with critics accusing Ottawa of using Alberta’s energy sector as a political scapegoat to appease urban, progressive voters elsewhere in Canada.

 

The introduction of Bill 54, which would lower the threshold for triggering a referendum and extend the timeframe for gathering petition signatures, is seen by some as a calculated response to these grievances. Premier Danielle Smith has framed the bill not as a direct call for secession but as a democratic tool to empower Albertans and give them a voice in deciding their own future. Nonetheless, the timing—coming just after another Liberal minority government win—suggests that federal-provincial tensions remain a key driver of this renewed push for provincial autonomy.

 

Underlying all of this is a cultural divide between Alberta and central Canada. Many Albertans feel their conservative, self-reliant values are increasingly out of step with the progressive policies championed in federal politics. For some, the idea of an independent Alberta is not just economic or political—it’s a matter of preserving identity and sovereignty in the face of what they perceive as distant and unresponsive leadership from Ottawa. The deep dive+5CityNews Edmonton+5CTV News+5

 

Under the proposed changes, the threshold for initiating a referendum would be lowered from 20% of eligible voters to 10% of those who voted in the last provincial election. Additionally, the time frame for collecting signatures would be extended from 90 to 120 days. Analysts estimate that this adjustment reduces the required number of signatures to approximately 170,000, making the prospect of a separation vote more attainable for proponents of Alberta's independence. the deep dive+1CityNews Edmonton+1GZERO Media

 

Premier Smith has emphasized that while she is not advocating for Alberta's secession, she supports mechanisms that allow citizens to express their will through referendums. She stated, "I believe in Alberta sovereignty within a united Canada," highlighting her stance on maintaining provincial autonomy while remaining part of the federation. CityNews Edmonton+1Wikipedia+1

 

The legislative move has sparked diverse reactions. Some view it as a strategic effort to empower Albertans in expressing their dissatisfaction with federal policies, particularly those affecting the province's energy sector and economic interests. Others, including Indigenous leaders, have raised concerns about the implications of such a referendum. Piikani Nation Chief Troy Knowlton emphasized that any discussion about Alberta's separation must respect existing treaties and require the consent of First Nations, stating that these treaties predate the province and cannot be unilaterally altered. Lethbridge News Now

 

Legal experts have also weighed in, noting that while the provincial government can facilitate referendums, the act of secession would involve complex constitutional considerations and negotiations with the federal government. The Supreme Court of Canada's 1998 ruling on Quebec's secession clarified that unilateral declarations of independence are not permissible under Canadian law, and any move toward separation would require a clear referendum result and subsequent constitutional discussions.

 

As the debate unfolds, the introduction of Bill 54 signifies a pivotal moment in Alberta's political landscape, reflecting ongoing tensions between provincial aspirations and federal unity. The coming months will reveal how these dynamics evolve and whether the province moves closer to holding a referendum on its future within Canada.

 

*UPDATE* Alberta referendum for secession is really happening

 

Sources:

Video:

 

The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.


🤡👍Dear Democrats, please keep doing what you're doing👍🤡

 

When individuals enter the United States illegally and then go on to commit crimes, the legal process surrounding their deportation becomes far more straightforward under U.S. immigration law.

 

CNN Cuts to Commercial When FIGHTING Starts After Anna Navarro Compares Slaves to Illegal Immigrants

 

 In these cases, conservative and mainstream legal frameworks strongly support the removal of such individuals—not only because they violated immigration laws by entering unlawfully, but because they also violated U.S. criminal laws once inside the country.

 

Here’s how the law addresses these situations:

 

  • Criminal Conduct Triggers Removal: Under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), non-citizens (including undocumented immigrants) can be deported if they commit certain crimes. These include aggravated felonies, drug trafficking, violent crimes, firearms offenses, and crimes involving moral turpitude. Convictions for these can result in mandatory detention and expedited removal proceedings.

  • Limited Protections for Criminal Aliens: Unlike asylum seekers or immigrants with lawful status who might be entitled to hearings or appeals, undocumented immigrants convicted of crimes typically have fewer legal avenues to avoid deportation. Courts, including immigration judges, tend to give considerable deference to enforcement actions when public safety is involved.

  • Sanctuary Policies and Local Resistance: In some jurisdictions, sanctuary city policies have created friction between local law enforcement and federal immigration authorities. Conservatives often criticize these policies, arguing that they shield dangerous individuals from removal and violate the principle of equal justice under the law.

  • Public Safety and Victims' Rights: From a conservative perspective, allowing individuals who entered illegally and then committed crimes to remain in the country sends a dangerous message and undermines the safety of law-abiding citizens. Deportation in such cases is not just a matter of immigration enforcement—it’s seen as a necessary measure to uphold law and order and protect communities.

 

In summary, if someone entered illegally and then committed crimes while in the United States, their deportation is not typically considered "wrongful" under the law. Instead, it is viewed as a lawful and justified action that reflects both immigration enforcement priorities and broader criminal justice standards. 

 

Most conservatives and moderates alike agree that such individuals should be removed promptly and barred from reentry.

 

The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.


Stephen Miller Unleashes Firestorm In White House Press Room

 

🚨BREAKING: Seconds Ago: Stephen Miller 

Unleashes Firestorm in White House Press Room! - YouTube

 

On May 1, 2025, White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller delivered a passionate and controversial briefing, emphasizing the administration's commitment to dismantling what he described as "cancerous, communist, woke culture." Miller's remarks underscored the administration's focus on cultural issues, including immigration, gender policies, and diversity programs. From a conservative standpoint, the briefing represented a long-awaited re-centering of national policy around traditional American values, constitutional governance, and the restoration of common sense in government.

 

Miller’s rhetoric resonated with many conservatives who argue that progressive cultural policies have eroded national unity, undermined the rule of law, and prioritized fringe agendas over the concerns of everyday Americans. His framing of woke ideology as a threat to national identity and stability echoed sentiments voiced by Republican lawmakers and grassroots activists who see government-enforced social engineering—whether in classrooms, military settings, or hiring practices—as both unconstitutional and socially destructive.

 

In addressing immigration, Miller doubled down on the administration’s belief that sanctuary city policies and lax border enforcement enabled criminal elements like MS-13 to thrive. He noted that Democrats and left-leaning media outlets were more concerned with political correctness than the safety of American families, a message that plays well with law-and-order voters. His assertion that the media’s portrayal of deportations distorted the facts was aimed squarely at undermining narratives that he argued favor criminal non-citizens over law-abiding citizens.

 

Miller’s criticism of gender policy and DEI programs also struck a chord with conservatives who have long challenged the expansion of federal power into areas of personal belief and institutional autonomy. His promise to eliminate DEI mandates within federal agencies was praised by critics who believe such programs foster racial division and undermine merit-based achievement. The administration's approach is being celebrated in many conservative circles as a decisive pushback against years of bureaucratic overreach and ideological experimentation.

 

Altogether, the briefing was not just a defense of policy—it was a cultural statement. Miller’s remarks clarified that under this administration, cultural issues are not secondary—they are central to the broader goal of restoring American self-determination, safeguarding tradition, and reasserting national sovereignty.

During the briefing, Miller criticized the media's coverage of immigration enforcement, particularly cases involving individuals with alleged gang affiliations. He defended the administration's actions, asserting that deportations of individuals like Kilmar Abrego Garcia were necessary to protect American communities. Miller challenged reporters, suggesting that their coverage favored criminal elements over public safety concerns. 

 

Addressing gender policies, Miller condemned the previous administration's approach, claiming that housing transgender women in female prisons led to increased risks of sexual assault. He announced that the current administration would enforce policies requiring inmates to be housed according to their biological sex and would prohibit federal funding for gender-transition treatments in prisons.

 

Miller also targeted diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs, arguing that they compromised merit-based hiring and contributed to societal division. He stated that the administration would take steps to eliminate DEI initiatives within federal agencies and institutions receiving federal funding.

 

The briefing highlighted the administration's prioritization of cultural issues over economic concerns, as Miller made minimal reference to the nation's economic challenges. This focus reflects the administration's strategy to appeal to its base by addressing contentious social topics. 

 

Sources:

Video

 

🚨BREAKING: Seconds Ago: Stephen Miller Unleashes Firestorm In White House Press Room!

 

The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.


It's a combination of imposed injections and the deployment of 5g technology.

 

Numerous people have collapsed in public, and rural cemeteries are nearly full.

 

Claims suggesting that COVID-19 vaccines and 5G technology have caused deaths in China have been widely circulated online. However, these assertions lack credible scientific evidence and have been consistently debunked by experts and health authorities (Mainstream).

While mainstream science has dismissed any link between 5G technology and COVID-19, fringe theories and alternative researchers continue to explore a different narrative—one that ties technological infrastructure and biological response to broader agendas of control and experimentation.

 

According to fringe theorists, the rollout of 5G technology coinciding with the emergence of COVID-19 is not a coincidence but a coordinated strategy. These researchers argue that 5G’s millimeter wave frequencies, though officially classified as non-ionizing, may have biological effects that are underreported or deliberately minimized. They point to small studies suggesting that prolonged exposure to EMF (electromagnetic fields) can lead to cellular stress, oxidative damage, or immune system suppression. In this view, 5G does not "cause" COVID-19, but may weaken immune defenses, making individuals more vulnerable to viruses or exacerbating symptoms.

 

Some proponents go further, claiming that the electromagnetic environment created by 5G may be deliberately weaponized or used in tandem with digital surveillance and biomedical programs to manipulate public behavior or monitor biometric data in real-time. These claims often reference classified military research, such as past DARPA projects involving neuroweapons or crowd control technologies.

 

In parallel, fringe theorists also question the motivations and transparency behind mass vaccination campaigns. Some allege that mRNA vaccine platforms serve not only to immunize populations but also to introduce nanotechnology capable of interacting with 5G or other digital infrastructure.

 

These theories cite patent filings, DARPA research into hydrogel biosensors, or documents from the World Economic Forum about future human-machine integration under frameworks like the “Fourth Industrial Revolution.” Though these claims remain speculative and are widely dismissed by institutional science, they continue to fuel online communities that distrust centralized public health narratives.

Other alternative researchers tie these concerns into broader depopulation or transhumanist agendas, arguing that the combination of electromagnetic exposure, vaccine ingredients, and long-term health manipulation could serve to reshape human biology, social control structures, and global population management under the guise of pandemic response.

While these theories are not supported by peer-reviewed studies or mainstream medical bodies, they resonate strongly among segments of the public who distrust global institutions, especially in light of past government experimentation (e.g., Tuskegee Syphilis Study, MK-Ultra) and inconsistent messaging during the COVID-19 pandemic.​

In summary, the claims that COVID-19 vaccines and 5G technology have led to deaths in China are (Mainstream) unfounded. Both technologies have been subjected to rigorous testing and monitoring to ensure their safety and efficacy. It is important to rely on credible sources and scientific evidence when evaluating such claims.

 

The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.